ArticleScientific reports2017
Model-Based Therapy Planning Allows Prediction of Haemodynamic Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual Therapy Planning of Aortic Valve Replacement for Preventing Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Computational Fluid Dynamic Assessment of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease from 3D Rotational Angiography.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Algorithmic Generation of Parameterized Geometric Models of the Aortic Valve and Left Ventricle.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a 13-year-old child with end-stage heart failure: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2021Article
- Computational evaluation of an extra-aortic elastic-wrap applied to simulated aging anisotropic human aorta models.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Able to Improve Hemodynamic Outcome?Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Impact of predictive medicine on therapeutic decision making: a randomized controlled trial in congenital heart disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
- Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: Perspective Roadmap to a Complex Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Article
- Towards a Computational Framework for Modeling the Impact of Aortic Coarctations Upon Left Ventricular Load.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimizing treatment planning is essential for advances in patient care and outcomes. Precisely tailored therapy for each patient remains a yearned-for goal. Cardiovascular modelling has the potential to simulate and predict the functional response before the actual intervention is performed. The objective of this study was to proof the validity of model-based prediction of haemodynamic outcome after aortic valve replacement. In a prospective study design virtual (model-based) treatment of the valve and the surrounding vasculature were performed alongside the actual surgical procedure (control group). The resulting predictions of anatomic and haemodynamic outcome based on information from magnetic resonance imaging before the procedure were compared to post-operative imaging assessment of the surgical control group in ten patients. Predicted vs. post-operative peak velocities across the valve were comparable (2.97 ± 1.12 vs. 2.68 ± 0.67 m/s; p = 0.362). In wall shear stress (17.3 ± 12.3 Pa vs. 16.7 ± 16.84 Pa; p = 0.803) and secondary flow degree (0.44 ± 0.32 vs. 0.49 ± 0.23; p = 0.277) significant linear correlations (p < 0.001) were found between predicted and post-operative outcomes. Between groups blood flow patterns showed good agreement (helicity p = 0.852, vorticity p = 0.185, eccentricity p = 0.333). Model-based therapy planning is able to accurately predict post-operative haemodynamics after aortic valve replacement. These validated virtual treatment procedures open up promising opportunities for individually targeted interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.