Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851875›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Model-Based Therapy Planning Allows Prediction of Haemodynamic Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement.

M Kelm, L Goubergrits, J Bruening, P Yevtushenko, J F Fernandes, S H Sündermann, F Berger, V Falk, T Kuehne, S Nordmeyer and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M KelmGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Berlin, Germany. mkelm@dhzb.de.
L GoubergritsGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Berlin, Germany.
J BrueningCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory, Berlin, Germany.
P YevtushenkoCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory, Berlin, Germany.
J F FernandesGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Berlin, Germany.
S H SündermannGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
F BergerGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Berlin, Germany.
V FalkGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
T KuehneGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Berlin, Germany.
S NordmeyerGerman Heart Centre Berlin, Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Unit of Cardiovascular Imaging, Berlin, Germany.
CARDIOPROOF group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing treatment planning is essential for advances in patient care and outcomes. Precisely tailored therapy for each patient remains a yearned-for goal. Cardiovascular modelling has the potential to simulate and predict the functional response before the actual intervention is performed. The objective of this study was to proof the validity of model-based prediction of haemodynamic outcome after aortic valve replacement. In a prospective study design virtual (model-based) treatment of the valve and the surrounding vasculature were performed alongside the actual surgical procedure (control group). The resulting predictions of anatomic and haemodynamic outcome based on information from magnetic resonance imaging before the procedure were compared to post-operative imaging assessment of the surgical control group in ten patients. Predicted vs. post-operative peak velocities across the valve were comparable (2.97 ± 1.12 vs. 2.68 ± 0.67 m/s; p = 0.362). In wall shear stress (17.3 ± 12.3 Pa vs. 16.7 ± 16.84 Pa; p = 0.803) and secondary flow degree (0.44 ± 0.32 vs. 0.49 ± 0.23; p = 0.277) significant linear correlations (p < 0.001) were found between predicted and post-operative outcomes. Between groups blood flow patterns showed good agreement (helicity p = 0.852, vorticity p = 0.185, eccentricity p = 0.333). Model-based therapy planning is able to accurately predict post-operative haemodynamics after aortic valve replacement. These validated virtual treatment procedures open up promising opportunities for individually targeted interventions.

Identifiers

PMID28851875
PMCPMC5575088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.