Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851860›Full record

ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2017

A qualitative study of GP, nurse and practice manager views on using targeted case-finding to identify patients with COPD in primary care.

Rachael H Summers, Taniya Sharmeen, Kate Lippiett, Kate Gillett, Carla Astles, Linh Vu, Mark Stafford-Watson, Anne Bruton, Mike Thomas, Tom Wilkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Case-finding for COPD in primary care: a qualitative study of patients' perspectives.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  9. Yonder: Case finding, HIV testing, trainee inductions, and waiting rooms.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachael H SummersFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Taniya SharmeenSchool of Pharmacy, University Reading, Reading, RG6 6UA, UK.
Kate LippiettFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Kate GillettNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Carla AstlesNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Linh VuPsychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Mark Stafford-WatsonNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Anne BrutonFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Mike ThomasNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. D.M.Thomas@soton.ac.uk.
Tom WilkinsonNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Department of Health SRF-2012-05-120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Finding the missing millions' with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease became part of the Department of Health strategy for England in 2010. Targeted case-finding within primary care is one potential pro-active strategy, but currently little is known about the views of healthcare professionals on this approach. In this study, 36 healthcare professionals (12 GPs, 14 nurses, and 10 practice managers) from 34 UK practices participated in semi-structured telephone interviews about targeted case-finding. Interviews followed an interview guide, were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using 'Framework Approach'. Most of those interviewed practiced opportunistic case-finding. The main perceived barriers to wider case-finding programmes were the resource implications associated with running such programmes and identifying more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Financial incentives, support from specialist clinicians, and comprehensive guidance were viewed as facilitators. While targeted case-finding is conceptually accepted by primary care staff, scepticism surrounding (1) the value of identifying those with mild disease and (2) the availability of effective targeted case-finding methods, may lead some to favour an opportunistic approach. Key concerns were a lack of unequivocal evidence for the relative benefits vs. disadvantages of diagnosing patients earlier, and resource constraints in an already over-burdened system. Barriers to practical implementation of case-finding studies may be addressed with financial, human and educational resources, such as additional staff to undertake searches and perform spirometry tests, and practical and educational support from specialist teams. CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE: SUPPORT NEEDED TO IDENTIFY THOSE UNDIAGNOSED: Additional staff and resources would facilitate targeted searches for patients showing symptoms of early-stage chronic lung disease. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) costs the UK economy billions of pounds each year, yet disparate symptoms mean patients aren't always diagnosed in the early, treatable stages of the disease. Recent guidelines suggest introducing 'targeted case-finding', where symptomatic patients with known risk factors are identified and approached for testing by doctors. Rachael Summers and colleagues at the University of Southampton analyzed the opinions of healthcare professionals on implementing targeted case-finding in primary care. While most of the 36 professionals interviewed agreed that diagnosing COPD earlier had clear benefits, concerns were raised regarding negative patient responses and increased stress for patients, alongside the added strain on already stretched resources. Employing independent staff and enhancing resources may facilitate such a program.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareAdministrative PersonnelAdultEnglandFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNurse PractitionersNursesPractice ManagementPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQualitative ResearchSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID28851860
PMCPMC5575077
OpenAlexW2749536540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.