Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851849›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

Functional Constraints on Replacing an Essential Gene with Its Ancient and Modern Homologs.

Betül Kacar, Eva Garmendia, Nurcan Tuncbag, Dan I Andersson, Diarmaid Hughes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rescue ofeLife · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evolutionary stalling and a limit on the power of natural selection to improve a cellular module.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Emerging Frontiers in the Study of Molecular Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Betül KacarDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA betul@arizona.edu.
Eva GarmendiaDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nurcan TuncbagDepartment of Health Informatics, Graduate School of Informatics, METU, Ankara, Turkey.
Dan I AnderssonDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Diarmaid HughesDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes encoding proteins that carry out essential informational tasks in the cell, in particular where multiple interaction partners are involved, are less likely to be transferable to a foreign organism. Here, we investigated the constraints on transfer of a gene encoding a highly conserved informational protein, translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), by systematically replacing the endogenous

Indexed as

DNA, AncientGenes, BacterialGenes, EssentialProtein BiosynthesisBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliGenetic FitnessGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialPeptide Elongation Factor TuPhylogenyProteobacteriaBacterial ProteinsDNA, AncientPeptide Elongation Factor Tuancient genesEF-Tuhorizontal gene transferproteobacteriatuf

Identifiers

PMID28851849
PMCPMC5574714
OpenAlexW2952510980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.