Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851798›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Study protocol for a multi-institutional, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III trial investigating additive efficacy of duloxetine for neuropathic cancer pain refractory to opioids and gabapentinoids: the DIRECT study.

Hiromichi Matsuoka, Hiroto Ishiki, Satoru Iwase, Atsuko Koyama, Takashi Kawaguchi, Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Tatsuya Morita, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Tempei Miyaji, Keisuke Ariyoshi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictors of duloxetine response in patients with neuropathic cancer pain: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial-JORTC-PAL08 (DIRECT) study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hiromichi MatsuokaPalliative Care Center, Cancer Center, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroto IshikiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru IwaseDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuko KoyamaPalliative Care Center, Cancer Center, Kindai University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takashi KawaguchiDepartment of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KizawaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Tatsuya MoritaPalliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yoshinobu MatsudaDepartment of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan.
Tempei MiyajiDepartment of Clinical Trial Data Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke AriyoshiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuhiro YamaguchiDepartment of Clinical Trial Data Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKindai University · JPKindai University Hospital · JPKobe University · JPNational Kinki Chuo Hospital for Chest Disease · JPSeirei Mikatabara General Hospital · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPTokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement of patients with cancer suffering from neuropathic pain refractory to opioids and gabapentinoids remains an important challenge. Duloxetine is one of the choices after first-line treatment fails. The efficacy of duloxetine has been reported in patients with non-cancer disease and in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, but no randomised clinical trials have examined its effects on neuropathic cancer pain refractory to first-line treatment. The objective of this study is to assess the analgesic efficacy of duloxetine in patients suffering from neuropathic cancer pain refractory to opioids and gabapentinoids. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multi-institutional, prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-parallel trial is planned. The inclusion criteria are adult patients with cancer suffering from neuropathic cancer pain refractory to opioids and gabapentinoids, patients with a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score of 4 or higher and patients with a total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score of less than 20. Patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy are excluded. The study will take place at 14 sites across Japan. Participants will be randomised (1:1 allocation ratio) to a duloxetine intervention group or a placebo control group. Evaluations will be made at baseline (T0 randomisation), day 0 (T1), day 3 (T2) and day 10 (T3). The primary endpoint is defined as the difference in NRS score for pain intensity (average over the previous 24 hours) at T3 between the duloxetine and placebo groups. A sample size of 70 patients will be examined between July 2015 and March 2018. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained at all participating sites.The results of this study will be submitted for publication in international peer-reviewed journals and the key findings presented at international scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000017647; Pre-results. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.2, 26 April 2017.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAminesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCancer PainCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodDuloxetine HydrochlorideGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeuralgiaResearch DesignAminesAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDuloxetine HydrochlorideGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric Acidduloxetineneuropathic cancer painpalliative carerandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28851798
PMCPMC5724096
OpenAlexW2751051767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.