Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851779›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Protocol for a randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled phase 4 study on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy compared with aflibercept with adjunctive photodynamic therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: the ATLANTIC study.

João Pedro Marques, Cláudia Farinha, Miguel Ângelo Costa, Ângela Ferrão, Sandrina Nunes, Rufino Silva

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02495181 (A Randomized, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Phase 4 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of IV Aflibercept Monotherapy Compared to Aflibercept With Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy in Patients With PCV.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02495181 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-masked, Sham-controlled Phase 4 Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of IV Aflibercept Monotherapy Compared to Aflibercept With Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy in Patients With PCV.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssociation for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and ImageRan2015 to 2019Enrolled50ConditionsPolypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyArmsIntravitreal Aflibercept
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João Pedro MarquesAssociation for Investigation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-0483
Cláudia FarinhaAssociation for Investigation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel Ângelo CostaAssociation for Investigation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.
Ângela FerrãoAssociation for Investigation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.
Sandrina NunesAssociation for Investigation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.
Rufino SilvaAssociation for Investigation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image (AIBILI), Coimbra, Portugal.
Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image · PTHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) with sham photodynamic therapy (sPDT) versus IVA with verteporfin PDT (vPDT) in a Caucasian population with treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), enrolling into a treat and extend (T&E) regimen. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled, multicentre phase 4 investigator-driven clinical trial. The primary outcomes are (1) change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline and (2) polyp regression at week 52, assessed by indocyanine green angiography (ICGA). Fifty patients with treatment-naive PCV will be recruited from Portuguese and Spanish clinical sites. Eligible patients will receive monthly IVA for 3 months (week 0, week 4 and week 8). At week 16, all patients will repeat ICGA and undergo central randomisation (1:1 ratio) into one of the following groups: Group 1-IVA T&E + vPDT; Group 2-IVA T&E + sPDT. PDT will be performed at week 16, week 28 and week 40 in the presence of active polyps. After week 16, the presence of macular fluid on optical coherence tomography will determine the schedule of observations. When present, the interval between visits/injections will decrease 2 weeks (minimum 6 weeks). When not, the interval between visits/injections will increase 2 weeks (maximum 12 weeks). Efficacy will be evaluated based on BCVA, central retinal thickness and polyp regression. Safety parameters will include assessment of intraocular pressure, adverse events and serious adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was designed and shall be implemented and reported in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice, with applicable local regulations and with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study received approval from Comissão de Ética para a Investigação Clínica and Comité Ético de investigación Clínica del Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered under the EudraCT number: 2015-001368-20 and the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02495181.

Indexed as

Intravitreal InjectionsPhotochemotherapyAgedChoroidChoroidal NeovascularizationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotosensitizing AgentsPolypsPorphyrinsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeafliberceptPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVerteporfinadverse eventsclinical pharmacologyclinical trialsmedical retinaophthalmologyprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID28851779
PMCPMC5629716
OpenAlexW2752884651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.