Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851706›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2017

DNA damage induces a kinetochore-based ATM/ATR-independent SAC arrest unique to the first meiotic division in mouse oocytes.

Simon I R Lane, Stephanie L Morgan, Tianyu Wu, Josie K Collins, Julie A Merriman, Elias ElInati, James M Turner, Keith T Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular basis of reproductive senescence: insights from model organisms.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meiotic spindle assembly checkpoint and aneuploidy in males versus females.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon I R LaneBiological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Simon.Lane@soton.ac.uk K.T.Jones@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8155-0981
Stephanie L MorganBiological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Tianyu WuBiological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Josie K CollinsBiological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Julie A MerrimanBiological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Elias ElInatiSex Chromosome Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
James M TurnerSex Chromosome Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, UK.
Keith T JonesBiological Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK Simon.Lane@soton.ac.uk K.T.Jones@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0294-0851
University of Southampton · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L006006/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse oocytes carrying DNA damage arrest in meiosis I, thereby preventing creation of embryos with deleterious mutations. The arrest is dependent on activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint, which results in anaphase-promoting complex (APC) inhibition. However, little is understood about how this checkpoint is engaged following DNA damage. Here, we find that within minutes of DNA damage checkpoint proteins are assembled at the kinetochore, not at damage sites along chromosome arms, such that the APC is fully inhibited within 30 min. Despite this robust response, there is no measurable loss in k-fibres, or tension across the bivalent. Through pharmacological inhibition we observed that the response is dependent on Mps1 kinase, aurora kinase and Haspin. Using oocyte-specific knockouts we find the response does not require the DNA damage response kinases ATM or ATR. Furthermore, checkpoint activation does not occur in response to DNA damage in fully mature eggs during meiosis II, despite the divisions being separated by just a few hours. Therefore, mouse oocytes have a unique ability to sense DNA damage rapidly by activating the checkpoint at their kinetochores.

Indexed as

DNA DamageMeiosisM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAnimalsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsAurora KinasesCentromereIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKinetochoresMiceModels, BiologicalOocytesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsAtr protein, mouseAurora KinasesHaspin protein, mouseIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTtk protein, mouseChromosomesDNA damage responseEtoposideMeiosisOocyteSpindle assembly checkpoint

Identifiers

PMID28851706
PMCPMC5665484
OpenAlexW2751072360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.