Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851678›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Automating Construction of Machine Learning Models With Clinical Big Data: Proposal Rationale and Methods.

Gang Luo, Bryan L Stone, Michael D Johnson, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, Adam B Wilcox, Sean D Mooney, Xiaoming Sheng, Peter J Haug, Flory L Nkoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Improving the Accuracy of Progress Indication for Constructing Deep Learning Models.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Progress Indication for Deep Learning Model Training: A Feasibility Demonstration.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Progress Indication for Machine Learning Model Building: A Feasibility Demonstration.SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gang LuoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-4008
Bryan L StoneDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-5227
Michael D JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5483-5933
Peter Tarczy-HornochDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-179X
Adam B WilcoxDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6305-735X
Sean D MooneyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0833
Xiaoming ShengDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-3699
Peter J HaugHomer Warner Research Center, Intermountain Healthcare, Murray, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-0116
Flory L NkoyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8954-8288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve health outcomes and cut health care costs, we often need to conduct prediction/classification using large clinical datasets (aka, clinical big data), for example, to identify high-risk patients for preventive interventions. Machine learning has been proposed as a key technology for doing this. Machine learning has won most data science competitions and could support many clinical activities, yet only 15% of hospitals use it for even limited purposes. Despite familiarity with data, health care researchers often lack machine learning expertise to directly use clinical big data, creating a hurdle in realizing value from their data. Health care researchers can work with data scientists with deep machine learning knowledge, but it takes time and effort for both parties to communicate effectively. Facing a shortage in the United States of data scientists and hiring competition from companies with deep pockets, health care systems have difficulty recruiting data scientists. Building and generalizing a machine learning model often requires hundreds to thousands of manual iterations by data scientists to select the following: (1) hyper-parameter values and complex algorithms that greatly affect model accuracy and (2) operators and periods for temporally aggregating clinical attributes (eg, whether a patient's weight kept rising in the past year). This process becomes infeasible with limited budgets.

objectiveThis study's goal is to enable health care researchers to directly use clinical big data, make machine learning feasible with limited budgets and data scientist resources, and realize value from data.

methodsThis study will allow us to achieve the following: (1) finish developing the new software, Automated Machine Learning (Auto-ML), to automate model selection for machine learning with clinical big data and validate Auto-ML on seven benchmark modeling problems of clinical importance; (2) apply Auto-ML and novel methodology to two new modeling problems crucial for care management allocation and pilot one model with care managers; and (3) perform simulations to estimate the impact of adopting Auto-ML on US patient outcomes.

resultsWe are currently writing Auto-ML's design document. We intend to finish our study by around the year 2022.

conclusionsAuto-ML will generalize to various clinical prediction/classification problems. With minimal help from data scientists, health care researchers can use Auto-ML to quickly build high-quality models. This will boost wider use of machine learning in health care and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

automated temporal aggregationautomatic model selectioncare managementclinical big datamachine learning

Identifiers

PMID28851678
PMCPMC5596298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.