ArticleJMIR research protocols2017
Automating Construction of Machine Learning Models With Clinical Big Data: Proposal Rationale and Methods.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinician-accessible automated machine learning in oral healthcare: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Performance Comparison of 10 State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Algorithms for Outcome Prediction Modeling of Radiation-Induced Toxicity.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Enhancing Health Research with Machine Learning: Practical Case Studies Using theData science in science · 2025Article
- AutoPrognosis 2.0: Democratizing diagnostic and prognostic modeling in healthcare with automated machine learning.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- A machine learning analysis of correlates of mortality among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Value of the First Clinical Impression as Assessed by 18 Observations in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Designing and identifying β-hairpin peptide macrocycles with antibiotic potential.Science advances · 2023Article
- Assess and validate predictive performance of models for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands comparing the value of registry data with high-granular electronic health records.International journal of medical informatics · 2022Observational
- Benchmarking AutoML frameworks for disease prediction using medical claims.BioData mining · 2022Article
- No-Code Platform-Based Deep-Learning Models for Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Histology from White-Light Endoscopy Images: Development and Performance Verification.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Improving the Accuracy of Progress Indication for Constructing Deep Learning Models.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2022Article
- Using Computational Methods to Improve Integrated Disease Management for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for a Secondary Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Use of Endoscopic Images in the Prediction of Submucosal Invasion of Gastric Neoplasms: Automated Deep Learning Model Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Progress Indication for Deep Learning Model Training: A Feasibility Demonstration.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2020Article
- Using Temporal Features to Provide Data-Driven Clinical Early Warnings for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Care Management: Protocol for a Secondary Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Automatic Machine-Learning-Based Outcome Prediction in Patients With Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- A roadmap for semi-automatically extracting predictive and clinically meaningful temporal features from medical data for predictive modeling.Global transitions · 2019Article
- Progress Indication for Machine Learning Model Building: A Feasibility Demonstration.SIGKDD explorations : newsletter of the Special Interest Group (SIG) on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2018Article
- Identifying Patients Who Are Likely to Receive Most of Their Care From a Specific Health Care System: Demonstration via Secondary Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2018Article
- Prognostication and Risk Factors for Cystic Fibrosis via Automated Machine Learning.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo improve health outcomes and cut health care costs, we often need to conduct prediction/classification using large clinical datasets (aka, clinical big data), for example, to identify high-risk patients for preventive interventions. Machine learning has been proposed as a key technology for doing this. Machine learning has won most data science competitions and could support many clinical activities, yet only 15% of hospitals use it for even limited purposes. Despite familiarity with data, health care researchers often lack machine learning expertise to directly use clinical big data, creating a hurdle in realizing value from their data. Health care researchers can work with data scientists with deep machine learning knowledge, but it takes time and effort for both parties to communicate effectively. Facing a shortage in the United States of data scientists and hiring competition from companies with deep pockets, health care systems have difficulty recruiting data scientists. Building and generalizing a machine learning model often requires hundreds to thousands of manual iterations by data scientists to select the following: (1) hyper-parameter values and complex algorithms that greatly affect model accuracy and (2) operators and periods for temporally aggregating clinical attributes (eg, whether a patient's weight kept rising in the past year). This process becomes infeasible with limited budgets.
objectiveThis study's goal is to enable health care researchers to directly use clinical big data, make machine learning feasible with limited budgets and data scientist resources, and realize value from data.
methodsThis study will allow us to achieve the following: (1) finish developing the new software, Automated Machine Learning (Auto-ML), to automate model selection for machine learning with clinical big data and validate Auto-ML on seven benchmark modeling problems of clinical importance; (2) apply Auto-ML and novel methodology to two new modeling problems crucial for care management allocation and pilot one model with care managers; and (3) perform simulations to estimate the impact of adopting Auto-ML on US patient outcomes.
resultsWe are currently writing Auto-ML's design document. We intend to finish our study by around the year 2022.
conclusionsAuto-ML will generalize to various clinical prediction/classification problems. With minimal help from data scientists, health care researchers can use Auto-ML to quickly build high-quality models. This will boost wider use of machine learning in health care and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.