Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851417›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Development of conventional and real-time multiplex PCR-based assays for estimation of natural infection rates and Trypanosoma cruzi load in triatomine vectors.

Otacilio C Moreira, Thaiane Verly, Paula Finamore-Araujo, Suzete A O Gomes, Catarina M Lopes, Danielle M de Sousa, Lívia R Azevedo, Fabio F da Mota, Claudia M d'Avila-Levy, Jacenir R Santos-Mallet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Live triatomine bug, vector ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New Approaches to the Ecology ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  14. High Parasitic Loads Quantified in SylvaticPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Otacilio C MoreiraLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thaiane VerlyLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paula Finamore-AraujoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Suzete A O GomesLaboratório de Biodiversidade de Parasitas e Vetores, Universidade Federal Fluminense/UFF, Rio de Janeiro, Niterói, Brazil.
Catarina M LopesLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Vigilância Entomológica de Diptera e Hemiptera, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Danielle M de SousaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Vigilância Entomológica de Diptera e Hemiptera, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lívia R AzevedoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fabio F da MotaLaboratório de Biologia Computacional e Sistemas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Claudia M d'Avila-LevyLaboratório de Estudos Integrados em Protozoologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jacenir R Santos-MalletLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Vigilância Entomológica de Diptera e Hemiptera, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Constança BrittoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. cbritto@ioc.fiocruz.br.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is a complex anthropozoonosis with distinct domestic and sylvatic mammal species acting as potential reservoirs. The diversity of vector species and their habitats are among the factors that hinder the control of the disease. Control programs periodically monitor the prevalence of T. cruzi infection in insect bugs through microscopical observation of diluted feces. However, microscopy presents limited sensitivity in samples with low parasite numbers, difficulties in examining all evolutionary stages of the insect and may in turn be limited to differentiate T. cruzi from other morphologically similar trypanosomatids. Here, we report two highly sensitive and accurate methodologies to infer T. cruzi infection rates and to quantify parasite load in the gut of field-collected triatomines.

methodsTriatomines were manually collected in the period 2011-2012 and 2014-2015, in domestic, peridomestic or sylvatic habitats in rural areas of 26 municipalities, encompassing three distinct Brazilian biomes: Caatinga, Cerrado and Atlantic Rainforest. Following morphological and taxonomical identification, the search for flagellated protozoa was performed by optical microscopy. A conventional PCR targeting T. cruzi kDNA and a TaqMan qPCR directed to the parasite nuclear satellite DNA (SAT) were developed, both in multiplex, with the triatomine 12S subunit ribosomal RNA gene, used as internal amplification control. Both methods were used for detection (kDNA-PCR) and parasite load quantification (SAT-DNA-qPCR), to investigate T. cruzi infection in captured triatomines.

resultsThe combined methods were assayed on a panel of 205 field-collected triatomine samples. Diagnostic analysis revealed 21% positivity for the kDNA-PCR, whereas microscopic examination enabled identification of T. cruzi in only 7.0% of the PCR-positive samples. Negative PCR results were confirmed by the absence of T. cruzi flagellates using microscopy. Caatinga biome yielded the highest T. cruzi infection rate (60%), followed by the Atlantic Rainforest and Cerrado with 7.1 and 6.1%, respectively. In addition, a wide range distribution of parasite load, varying from 8.05 × 10

conclusionsOur results demonstrate highly sensitive PCR-based methodologies to monitor T. cruzi infection in triatomines. In addition, the qPCR assay offers the possibility of further evaluation parasite load, as a promising biomarker of the vectorial capacity of triatomines in Chagas disease endemic areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticBrazilChagas DiseaseDNA, KinetoplastDNA, ProtozoanEndemic DiseasesHumansInsect VectorsMicroscopyMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPanstrongylusParasite LoadReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTriatomaDNA, KinetoplastDNA, ProtozoanMultiplex PCRNatural infectionParasite loadReal-time qPCRTriatominesTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID28851417
PMCPMC5576278
OpenAlexW2753455474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.