Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851407›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension (REFRESH): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Stephen P J Macdonald, David McD Taylor, Gerben Keijzers, Glenn Arendts, Daniel M Fatovich, Frances B Kinnear, Simon G A Brown, Rinaldo Bellomo, Sally Burrows, John F Fraser and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Trajectory of Kidney Function: The Canary in Sepsis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Pragmatic Pediatric Trial of Balanced Versus Normal Saline Fluid in Sepsis: The PRoMPT BOLUS Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Feasibility Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen P J MacdonaldCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia. stephen.macdonald@uwa.edu.au.
David McD TaylorEmergency Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gerben KeijzersEmergency Department, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Glenn ArendtsCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Daniel M FatovichCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Frances B KinnearEmergency and Children's Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Simon G A BrownCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sally BurrowsSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
John F FraserSchool of Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Edward LittonDepartment of Intensive Care, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Juan Carlos Ascencio-LaneEmergency Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Matthew AnsteyDepartment of Intensive Care, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
David McCutcheonCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Lisa SmartCentre for Clinical Research in Emergency Medicine, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Ioana VladEmergency Department, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
James WinearlsSchool of Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Bradley WibrowDepartment of Intensive Care, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AUAustin Hospital · AUBond University · AUFiona Stanley Hospital · AUGold Coast Hospital · AURoyal Hobart Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend an initial intravenous (IV) fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg isotonic crystalloid for patients with sepsis and hypotension. However, there is a lack of evidence from clinical trials to support this. Accumulating observational data suggest harm associated with the injudicious use of fluids in sepsis. There is currently equipoise regarding liberal or restricted fluid-volume resuscitation as first-line treatment for sepsis-related hypotension. A randomised trial comparing these two approaches is, therefore, justified. METHODS/

designThe REstricted Fluid REsuscitation in Sepsis-associated Hypotension trial (REFRESH) is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase II clinical feasibility trial. Participants will be patients presenting to the emergency departments of Australian metropolitan hospitals with suspected sepsis and a systolic blood pressure of < 100 mmHg, persisting after a 1000-ml fluid bolus with isotonic crystalloid. Participants will be randomised to either a second 1000-ml fluid bolus (standard care) or maintenance rate fluid only, with the early commencement of a vasopressor infusion to maintain a mean arterial pressure of > 65 mmHg, if required (restricted fluid). All will receive further protocolised fluid boluses (500 ml or 250 ml, respectively), if required during the 6-h study period. The primary outcome measure is total volume administered in the first 6 h. Secondary outcomes include fluid volume at 24 h, organ support 'free days' to day 28, 90-day mortality, and a range of feasibility and process-of-care measures. Participants will also undergo serial measurement, over the first 24 h, of biomarkers of inflammation, endothelial cell activation and glycocalyx degradation for comparison between the groups. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomised trial examining fluid volume for initial resuscitation in septic shock in an industrialised country. A pragmatic, open-label design will establish the feasibility of undertaking a large, international, multicentre trial with sufficient power to assess clinical outcomes. The embedded biomarker study aims to provide mechanistic plausibility for a larger trial by defining the effects of fluid volume on markers of systemic inflammation and the vascular endothelium.

trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ID: ACTRN12616000006448. Registered on 12 January 2016.

Indexed as

Blood PressureFluid TherapyAustraliaClinical ProtocolsCrystalloid SolutionsEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesHumansHypotensionInfusions, IntravenousIsotonic SolutionsPilot ProjectsResearch DesignResuscitationShock, SepticTime FactorsCrystalloid SolutionsIsotonic SolutionsVasoconstrictor AgentsFluid therapyHypotensionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID28851407
PMCPMC5576288
OpenAlexW2750890118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.