ArticleJournal of translational medicine2017
In silico prediction of novel therapeutic targets using gene-disease association data.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for antimicrobial discovery and optimization.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- From Prompt to Drug: Toward Pharmaceutical Superintelligence.ACS central science · 2026Review
- International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium Portal: facilitating investigation of gene function and providing insights into human disease.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy drug target identification using machine learning and patient-derived tumour explant validation.Nature machine intelligence · 2026Article
- Robustness Analyses Substantially Narrow in silico Network-Toxicology Signals Linking Selected Pharmaceuticals and Caffeine to Vitiligo.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Mapping metabolic reprogramming in lung and breast cancer through integrative bioinformatics.PloS one · 2026Article
- International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium: Investigating gene function and providing insights into human disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technologies Transforming Contemporary Pharmaceutical Research.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence driven innovations in biochemistry: A review of emerging research frontiers.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Review
- SUMOylation-related genes define prognostic subtypes in stomach adenocarcinoma: integrating single-cell analysis and machine learning analyses.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Therapeutic gene target prediction using novel deep hypergraph representation learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Applications of Machine Learning (ML) and Mathematical Modeling (MM) in Healthcare with Special Focus on Cancer Prognosis and Anticancer Therapy: Current Status and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Synergies in Drug Discovery: From Computers to Clinics.Current pharmaceutical design · 2024Review
- Deciphering the Anticancer Arsenal ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- In Silico and In Vivo Evaluation of the Maqui Berry (Metabolites · 2023Article
- Synthesis of an aggregation-induced emission-based fluorescent probe based on rupestonic acid.RSC advances · 2023Article
- PINNED: identifying characteristics of druggable human proteins using an interpretable neural network.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- TargIDe: a machine-learning workflow for target identification of molecules with antibiofilm activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2023Article
- A publication-wide association study (PWAS), historical language models to prioritise novel therapeutic drug targets.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTarget identification and validation is a pressing challenge in the pharmaceutical industry, with many of the programmes that fail for efficacy reasons showing poor association between the drug target and the disease. Computational prediction of successful targets could have a considerable impact on attrition rates in the drug discovery pipeline by significantly reducing the initial search space. Here, we explore whether gene-disease association data from the Open Targets platform is sufficient to predict therapeutic targets that are actively being pursued by pharmaceutical companies or are already on the market.
methodsTo test our hypothesis, we train four different classifiers (a random forest, a support vector machine, a neural network and a gradient boosting machine) on partially labelled data and evaluate their performance using nested cross-validation and testing on an independent set. We then select the best performing model and use it to make predictions on more than 15,000 genes. Finally, we validate our predictions by mining the scientific literature for proposed therapeutic targets.
resultsWe observe that the data types with the best predictive power are animal models showing a disease-relevant phenotype, differential expression in diseased tissue and genetic association with the disease under investigation. On a test set, the neural network classifier achieves over 71% accuracy with an AUC of 0.76 when predicting therapeutic targets in a semi-supervised learning setting. We use this model to gain insights into current and failed programmes and to predict 1431 novel targets, of which a highly significant proportion has been independently proposed in the literature.
conclusionsOur in silico approach shows that data linking genes and diseases is sufficient to predict novel therapeutic targets effectively and confirms that this type of evidence is essential for formulating or strengthening hypotheses in the target discovery process. Ultimately, more rapid and automated target prioritisation holds the potential to reduce both the costs and the development times associated with bringing new medicines to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.