Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851344›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Measurement properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) among older adults who present to the emergency department after a fall: a Rasch analysis.

Rebecca L Morris, Sze-Ee Soh, Keith D Hill, Rachelle Buchbinder, Judy A Lowthian, Julie Redfern, Christopher D Etherton-Beer, Anne-Marie Hill, Richard H Osborne, Glenn Arendts and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Developing a validity testing plan for a patient-reported outcome measure in a new context using the argument-based approach to validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Measuring health literacy: methods and tools for assessing general health literacy in adults].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Awareness of diagnosis, treatment and risk of late effects in Chinese survivors of childhood cancer in Hong Kong.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca L MorrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. rebecca.morris@monash.edu.
Sze-Ee SohDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Keith D HillSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Rachelle BuchbinderDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Judy A LowthianDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Julie RedfernThe George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Christopher D Etherton-BeerWestern Australian Centre for Health & Ageing, University of Western Australia and Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Anne-Marie HillSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Richard H OsborneHealth Systems Improvement Unit, Deakin University Centre for Population Health Research, Geelong, Australia.
Glenn ArendtsSchool of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Anna L BarkerDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Monash University · AUCurtin University · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUDeakin University · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth literacy is an important concept associated with participation in preventive health initiatives, such as falls prevention programs. A comprehensive health literacy measurement tool, appropriate for this population, is required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in a cohort of older adults who presented to a hospital emergency department (ED) after a fall.

methodsOlder adults who presented to an ED after a fall had their health literacy assessed using the HLQ (n = 433). Data were collected as part of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a falls prevention program. Measurement properties of the HLQ were assessed using Rasch analysis.

resultsAll nine scales of the HLQ were unidimensional, with good internal consistency reliability. No item bias was found for most items (43 of 44). A degree of overall misfit to the Rasch model was evident for six of the nine HLQ scales. The majority of misfit indicated content overlap between some items and does not compromise measurement. A measurement gap was identified for this cohort at mid to high HLQ score.

conclusionsThe HLQ demonstrated good measurement properties in a cohort of older adults who presented to an ED after a fall. The summation of the HLQ items within each scale, providing unbiased information on nine separate areas of health literacy, is supported. Clinicians, researchers and policy makers may have confidence using the HLQ scale scores to gain information about health literacy in older people presenting to the ED after a fall.

trial registrationThis study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12614000336684 (27 March 2014).

Indexed as

Accidental FallsHealth LiteracySurveys and QuestionnairesAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreventive Health ServicesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsFalls preventionHealth literacyMeasurement propertiesOlder adultsRasch analysis

Identifiers

PMID28851344
PMCPMC5575841
OpenAlexW2750972373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.