ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017
Measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion via CT generated 3D pelvic model.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient-acceptable state (PASS), minimally detectable change (MDC), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) in patients who have undergone arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026Pooled it
- The addition of vitamin E could reduce femoral head penetration of the polyethylene liners.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty for preoperative planning and intraoperative decision-making.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Trial
- Using an App based algorithm to determine axial rotation and pelvic tilt at the time of an AP radiograph: a sawbone study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Hidden Links: Anatomical and Radiological Insights into Primary Hip Osteoarthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Accuracy and Reliability of Pelvimetry Measures Obtained by Manual or Automatic Labeling of Three-Dimensional Pelvic Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Normal and Dysplastic Hip Joints in Children.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- The "true" acetabular anteversion angle (AV angle): 2D CT versus 3D model.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Assessing component orientation of total hip arthroplasty using the low-dose bi-planar radiographs.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- A Deep Learning Tool for Automated Radiographic Measurement of Acetabular Component Inclination and Version After Total Hip Arthroplasty.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2021Article
- A comparative radiographic morphometric analysis to assess the normal radiological morphology of the adult hip in indian population.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Article
- [Radiographic inclination and anteversion do not correspond to the actual cup slope and forward rotation].Der Orthopade · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInclination and anteversion were the main factors that determined the reliability of the acetabulum. Inclination and anteversion measurements included anatomical, operational and radiographic methods. The aim of our present study was to exhibit divergence of inclination and anteversion via the three measurements.
methodsInclination and anteversion were defined according to the definitions put forward by Murray. Three-dimensional models of pelvis of CT data were brought forth. Acetabular axis was determined by the rim of acetabula. Reference planes were established by bone landmarks including anterior superior iliac spine, pubic tubercles and sacral crests. Inclinations and anteversions were calculated according to the definitions.
resultsForty-nine cases were involved in the research. Data of inclination form anatomical, operational and radiographic showed 37.48 ± 11.07, 45.12 ± 14.76 and 48.76 ± 14.36, and anteversion were 18.12 ± 7.59, 24.97 ± 9.68, 14.30 ± 5.64. A substantial deviation was noted in the inclinations (P < 0.01) and anteversions (P < 0.01).
conclusionOur findings suggested that the inclinations and anteversions of the three measurements varied, which might in turn interfere the decision of orthopedists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.