Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851320›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2017

Cilostazol improves endothelial function in acute cerebral ischemia patients: a double-blind placebo controlled trial with flow-mediated dilation technique.

Seong-Joon Lee, Jin Soo Lee, Mun Hee Choi, Sung Eun Lee, Dong Hoon Shin, Ji Man Hong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03116269 (The Effect of Cilostazol Compared to Aspirin on Endothelial Function Measured by Flow Mediated Dilatation in Acute Cerebral Ischemia Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03116269 phase4completednot on this map

The Effect of Cilostazol Compared to Aspirin on Endothelial Function Measured by Flow Mediated Dilatation in Acute Cerebral Ischemia Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAjou University School of MedicineRan2012 to 2014Enrolled80ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Endothelial DysfunctionArmsCilostazol 100mg, Aspirin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Cilostazole versus clopidogrel in acute large-vessel moderate and moderate-to-severe ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seong-Joon LeeDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jin Soo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Mun Hee ChoiDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sung Eun LeeDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Dong Hoon ShinDepartment of Neurology, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Man HongDepartment of Neurology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea. dacda@hanmail.net.
Ajou University · KRDeleted Institution

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to evaluate the impact of cilostazol on endothelial function, we compared the changes of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) between aspirin and cilostazol groups in patients with acute cerebral ischemia.

methodsPatients presenting with acute cerebral ischemic events were randomly assigned into aspirin (n = 40) or cilostazol (n = 40) group in a double-blinded manner. FMD was measured at baseline (T0) and 90 days (T1). We measured L-arginine at baseline (a precursor of biologically active nitric oxides). Serious and non-serious adverse events were described.

resultsDespite no difference in the baseline FMD values (p = 0.363), there was a significant increase of FMD values in cilostazol group (7.9 ± 2.4 to 8.9 ± 2.3%, p = 0.001) and not in aspirin group (8.5 ± 2.6 to 9.3 ± 2.8%, p = 0.108). In the multiple regression analysis performed in cilostazol group, serum L-arginine levels were inversely correlated with FMD at T1 (ß = -0.050, SE: 0.012, p < 0.001) with age, total cholesterol levels, and C-reactive protein as confounders. While T0 FMD values in both aspirin and cilostazol groups did not show any correlation with serum L-arginine levels, the correlation is restored in the cilostazol group at T1 (r = 0.467, p = 0.007), while such is not shown in the aspirin group. There was no difference of serious adverse events between the two groups (p = 0.235). Adverse events were more common in the cilostazol group (35/40 vs. 25/40, p = 0.010), due to frequent headaches (14/40 vs. 3/30, p = 0.003) which was well tolerated.

conclusionCilostazol improved endothelial function in acute cerebral ischemia patients. It also restored an inverse correlation between 3-month FMD and baseline L-arginine levels.

trial registrationNCT03116269 , 04/12/2017, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArginineAspirinBrain IschemiaCilostazolC-Reactive ProteinDilatationDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, VascularFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTetrazolesArginineAspirinCilostazolC-Reactive ProteinTetrazolesArginineCerebral infarctionCilostazolEndotheliumTransient ischemic attack

Identifiers

PMID28851320
PMCPMC5576326
OpenAlexW2750651701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.