Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28851234›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie2017

Depression Screening and Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Michelle Roseman, Nazanin Saadat, Kira E Riehm, Lorie A Kloda, Jill Boruff, Abel Ickowicz, Franziska Baltzer, Laurence Y Katz, Scott B Patten, Cécile Rousseau and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. 2025 update of the Greig Health Record: Part 2-what's controversial?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Depression and Anxiety Disorders among Schoolgoing Adolescents in an Urban Area of South India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Featured Canadian Research on Child, Adolescent, and Young Adult Psychiatry.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle Roseman1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario.
Nazanin Saadat2 Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec.
Kira E Riehm2 Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec.
Lorie A Kloda3 Library, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec.
Jill Boruff4 Schulich Library of Science and Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Québec.
Abel Ickowicz5 Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Franziska Baltzer6 Montréal Children's Hospital, Montréal, Québec.
Laurence Y Katz8 Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Scott B Patten9 Departments of Psychiatry and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
Cécile Rousseau10 Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Québec.
Brett D Thombs2 Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec.ORCID 0000-0002-5644-8432
Jewish General Hospital · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAConcordia University · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

CIHR KA1 – 119795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDepression screening among children and adolescents is controversial. In 2009, the United States Preventive Services Task Force first recommended routine depression screening for adolescents, and this recommendation was reiterated in 2016. However, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of screening were identified in the original 2009 systematic review or in an updated review through February 2015. The objective of this systematic review was to provide a current evaluation to determine whether there is evidence from RCTs that depression screening in childhood and adolescence improves depression outcomes.

methodData sources included the MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL and LILACS databases searched February 2, 2017. Eligible studies had to be RCTs that compared depression outcomes between children or adolescents aged 6 to 18 years who underwent depression screening and those who did not.

resultsOf 552 unique title/abstracts, none received full-text review. No RCTs that investigated the effects of screening on depression outcomes in children or adolescents were identified.

conclusionsThere is no direct RCT evidence that supports depression screening among children and adolescents. Groups that consider recommending screening should carefully consider potential harms, as well as the use of scarce health resources, that would occur with the implementation of screening programs.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentChildDepressive DisorderHumansMass Screeningchild and adolescent psychiatrydepressive disordersscreening

Identifiers

PMID28851234
PMCPMC5714120
OpenAlexW2752672512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.