Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28850885›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2017

Quantifying behavior to solve sensorimotor transformations: advances from worms and flies.

Adam J Calhoun, Mala Murthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On growth and form of animal behavior.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The what, how, and why of naturalistic behavior.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Body language signals for rodent social communication.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Coordinated crawling via reinforcement learning.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Life of Behavior.Neuron · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam J CalhounPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States.
Mala MurthyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States.

Funding

How does the brain solve the pattern recognition problem?DP2NS092378 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MURTHY, MALA · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS092378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of new computational tools has recently opened up the study of natural behaviors at a precision that was previously unachievable. These tools permit a highly quantitative analysis of behavioral dynamics at timescales that are well matched to the timescales of neural activity. Here we examine how combining these methods with established techniques for estimating an animal's sensory experience presents exciting new opportunities for dissecting the sensorimotor transformations performed by the nervous system. We focus this review primarily on examples from Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster-for these model systems, computational approaches to characterize behavior, in combination with unparalleled genetic tools for neural activation, silencing, and recording, have already proven instrumental for illuminating underlying neural mechanisms.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyDrosophila melanogaster

Identifiers

PMID28850885
PMCPMC5765764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.