Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28850706›Full record

Observational studyBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2017

Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.

Diana R Jolles, Rae Langford, Susan Stapleton, Sandra Cesario, Anne Koci, Jill Alliman

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Freestanding Birth Centers: An Evidence-Based Option for Birth.The Journal of perinatal education · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diana R JollesNurse-midwife El Rio Community Health Center, Faculty, Frontier Nursing University, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-9179
Rae LangfordTexas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA.
Susan StapletonAmerican Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, Perkiomenville, PA, USA.
Sandra CesarioTexas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA.
Anne KociTexas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA.
Jill AllimanAmerican Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry, Perkiomenville, PA, USA.
Texas Woman's University · USWisconsin Association for Perinatal Care · USCommunity Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariations in care for pregnant women have been reported to affect pregnancy outcomes.

methodsThis study examined data for all 3136 Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled at American Association of Birth Centers (AABC) Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Strong Start sites who gave birth between 2012 and 2014. Using the AABC Perinatal Data Registry, descriptive statistics were used to evaluate socio-behavioral and medical risks, and core perinatal quality outcomes. Next, the 2082 patients coded as low medical risk on admission in labor were analyzed for effective care and preference sensitive care variations. Finally, using binary logistic regression, the associations between selected care processes and cesarean delivery were explored.

resultsMedicaid beneficiaries enrolled at AABC sites had diverse socio-behavioral and medical risk profiles and exceeded quality benchmarks for induction, episiotomy, cesarean, and breastfeeding. Among medically low-risk women, the model demonstrated effective care variations including 82% attendance at prenatal education classes, 99% receiving midwifery-led prenatal care, and 84% with midwifery- attended birth. Patient preferences were adhered to with 83% of women achieving birth at their preferred site of birth, and 95% of women using their preferred infant feeding method. Elective hospitalization in labor was associated with a 4-times greater risk of cesarean birth among medically low-risk childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries.

conclusionsThe birth center model demonstrates the capability to achieve the triple aims of improved population health, patient experience, and value.

Indexed as

MedicaidAdultBirthing CentersCesarean SectionEpisiotomyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMidwiferyPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareProspective StudiesRegistriesRisk Factorsbirthing centerscesarean birthMedicaid

Identifiers

PMID28850706
PMCPMC5873276
OpenAlexW2753925911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.