Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849718›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

Working with community health workers to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes: implementation and scale-up lessons from eastern Uganda.

Gertrude Namazzi, Monica Okuga, Moses Tetui, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Ayub Kakaire, Sarah Namutamba, Aloysius Mutebi, Suzanne Namusoke Kiwanuka, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Peter Waiswa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gertrude Namazzia Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1239-8311
Monica Okugaa Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-7111
Moses Tetuia Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6833-7601
Rornald Muhumuza Kananuraa Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.
Ayub Kakairea Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.
Sarah Namutambaa Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.
Aloysius Mutebia Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-5488
Suzanne Namusoke Kiwanukaa Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4729-4897
Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kirachoa Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.
Peter Waiswaa Makerere University , School of Public Health (MakSPH) , Kampala , Uganda.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-0515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreventable maternal and newborn deaths can be averted through simple evidence-based interventions, such as the use of community health workers (CHWs), also known in Uganda as village health teams. However, the CHW strategy faces implementation challenges regarding training packages, supervision, and motivation.

objectivesThis paper explores knowledge levels of CHWs, describes the coverage of home visits, and shares lessons learnt from setting up and implementing the CHW strategy.

methodsThe CHWs were trained to conduct four home visits: two during pregnancy and two after delivery. The aim of the visits was to promote birth preparedness and utilization of maternal and newborn health (MNH) services. Mixed methods of data collection were employed. Quantitative data were analyzed using Stata version 13.0 to determine the level and predictors of CHW knowledge of MNH. Qualitative data from 10 key informants and 15 CHW interviews were thematically analyzed to assess the implementation experiences.

resultsCHWs' knowledge of MNH improved from 41.3% to 77.4% after training, and to 79.9% 1 year post-training. However, knowledge of newborn danger signs declined from 85.5% after training to 58.9% 1 year later. The main predictors of CHW knowledge were age (≥ 35 years) and post-primary level of education. The level of coverage of at least one CHW visit to pregnant and newly delivered mothers was 57.3%. Notably, CHW reports complemented the facility-based health information. CHWs formed associations, which improved teamwork, reporting, and general performance, and thus maintained low dropout rates at 3.6%. Challenges included dissatisfaction with the quarterly transport refund of 6 USD and lack of means of transportation such as bicycles.

conclusionsCHWs are an important resource in community-based health information and improving demand for MNH services. However, the CHW training and supervision models require strengthening for improved performance. Local solutions regarding CHW motivation are necessary for sustainability.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHouse CallsHumansInfant HealthMaleMaternal-Child Health ServicesMiddle AgedMotivationPostnatal CarePrenatal CareUgandaYoung Adultcommunity health workerscommunity mobilizationimplementation scienceMANIFEST - Maternal and Neonatal Implementation for Equitable Systems StudyMaternal and newborn healthtraining and supervision

Identifiers

PMID28849718
PMCPMC5786312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.