ArticleJournal of proteome research2017
Proteomics Standards Initiative: Fifteen Years of Progress and Future Work.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2026: making proteomics data FAIR.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of FFPE tissues: progress, limitations, and clinical translation barriers.Clinical proteomics · 2025Review
- The Proteomics Standards Initiative Standardized Formats for Spectral Libraries and Fragment Ion Peak Annotations: mzSpecLib and mzPAF.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry.ACS measurement science au · 2024Review
- Article
- The 2022 Report on the Human Proteome from the HUPO Human Proteome Project.Journal of proteome research · 2023Review
- Proteomics Standards Initiative at Twenty Years: Current Activities and Future Work.Journal of proteome research · 2023Review
- Trans-Proteomic Pipeline: Robust Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis Suite.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Patpat: a public proteomics dataset search framework.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- The ProteomeXchange consortium at 10 years: 2023 update.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) in 2022.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Databases and Tools to Investigate Protein-Metabolite Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The critical role that spectral libraries play in capturing the metabolomics community knowledge.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2022Review
- A Current Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics Tools, Data Formats and Resources for Mass Spectrometry Lipidomics.Metabolites · 2022Review
- The Intricacy of the Viral-Human Protein Interaction Networks: Resources, Data, and Analyses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Advances and Utility of the Human Plasma Proteome.Journal of proteome research · 2021Review
- Progress Identifying and Analyzing the Human Proteome: 2021 Metrics from the HUPO Human Proteome Project.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- The Arabidopsis PeptideAtlas: Harnessing worldwide proteomics data to create a comprehensive community proteomics resource.The Plant cell · 2021Article
- A proteomics sample metadata representation for multiomics integration and big data analysis.Nature communications · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) has now been developing and promoting open community standards and software tools in the field of proteomics for 15 years. Under the guidance of the chair, cochairs, and other leadership positions, the PSI working groups are tasked with the development and maintenance of community standards via special workshops and ongoing work. Among the existing ratified standards, the PSI working groups continue to update PSI-MI XML, MITAB, mzML, mzIdentML, mzQuantML, mzTab, and the MIAPE (Minimum Information About a Proteomics Experiment) guidelines with the advance of new technologies and techniques. Furthermore, new standards are currently either in the final stages of completion (proBed and proBAM for proteogenomics results as well as PEFF) or in early stages of design (a spectral library standard format, a universal spectrum identifier, the qcML quality control format, and the Protein Expression Interface (PROXI) web services Application Programming Interface). In this work we review the current status of all of these aspects of the PSI, describe synergies with other efforts such as the ProteomeXchange Consortium, the Human Proteome Project, and the metabolomics community, and provide a look at future directions of the PSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.