Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849561›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017

Extracting the Strongest Signals from Omics Data: Differentially Expressed Pathways and Beyond.

Galina Glazko, Yasir Rahmatallah, Boris Zybailov, Frank Emmert-Streib

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Galina GlazkoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. gvglazko@uams.edu.
Yasir RahmatallahDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Boris ZybailovDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Frank Emmert-StreibComputational Medicine and Statistical Learning Laboratory, Tampere University of Technology, Korkeakoulunkatu 1, Tampere, 33720, Finland.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
VIRULENCE MECHANISMS IN ESCHERICHIA COLIP20RR016460 · NCRR · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI HENSLEY, LORI · 2001 to 2011
$33.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016460NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of gene sets (in a form of functionally related genes or pathways) has become the method of choice for extracting the strongest signals from omics data. The motivation behind using gene sets instead of individual genes is two-fold. First, this approach incorporates pre-existing biological knowledge into the analysis and facilitates the interpretation of experimental results. Second, it employs a statistical hypotheses testing framework. Here, we briefly review main Gene Set Analysis (GSA) approaches for testing differential expression of gene sets and several GSA approaches for testing statistical hypotheses beyond differential expression that allow extracting additional biological information from the data. We distinguish three major types of GSA approaches testing: (1) differential expression (DE), (2) differential variability (DV), and (3) differential co-expression (DC) of gene sets between two phenotypes. We also present comparative power analysis and Type I error rates for different approaches in each major type of GSA on simulated data. Our evaluation presents a concise guideline for selecting GSA approaches best performing under particular experimental settings. The value of the three major types of GSA approaches is illustrated with real data example. While being applied to the same data set, major types of GSA approaches result in complementary biological information.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyComputer SimulationData MiningGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeCompetitiveDifferential co-expressionDifferential expressionDifferential variabilityGene set analysis approachesHypotheses testingOmics dataSelf-contained

Identifiers

PMID28849561
PMCPMC5846121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.