Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849413›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017

Prognostic stratification of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma using a clinical and biochemical scoring system.

Jeremy Chee, Kwok Seng Loh, Ivan Tham, Francis Ho, Lea Choung Wong, Chee Seng Tan, Boon Cher Goh, Chwee Ming Lim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy CheeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 7, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Kwok Seng LohDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 7, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Ivan ThamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Francis HoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Lea Choung WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Chee Seng TanDepartment of Medical Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Cher GohDepartment of Medical Oncology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Chwee Ming LimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block Level 7, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. chwee_ming_lim@nuhs.edu.sg.
National University Health System · SG

Funding

National Medical Research Council TA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is known to have poor survival outcomes. Clinical and biochemical parameters may impact survival outcomes among patients with metastatic NPC and may be used for prognostication.

methodsOne-hundred and fifty-eight patients with metastatic NPC treated at a single tertiary institution were analyzed retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was carried out on patients who were given disease control treatment (n = 135). A numerical score derived from the regression coefficients of each identified independent variable was used to create prognostic groups (PG). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsIndependent negative prognostic factors included ECOG status >1, LDH level >580 U/L, hemoglobin level <12.0 g/dL and having more than one metastatic organ involvement. Three PGs were obtained: low risk (total score = 0), intermediate risk (1-2) and high risk (3-4). Median survivals of the 3 groups (low, intermediate and high risk) were 57.1, 18.1 and 8.0 months for the three different risk groups, respectively (p < 0.001).

conclusionRisk stratification of patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer is possible using a prognostic scoring system based on clinical and biochemical parameters. Patients with low-risk score may achieve good metastatic survival and may benefit from additional therapy for disease control.

Indexed as

CarcinomaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesAdvancedMetastaticNasopharyngeal carcinomaPrognostic factorPrognostic score

Identifiers

PMID28849413
PMCPMC11819290
OpenAlexW2748552337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.