Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849362›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Translating Prevention Research for Evidence-Based Policymaking: Results from the Research-to-Policy Collaboration Pilot.

Max Crowley, J Taylor Bishop Scott, Diana Fishbein

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03671434 (Testing an Approach to Improve the Use of Evidence), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03671434 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Testing an Approach to Improve the Use of Evidence

TypeinterventionalSponsorPenn State UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled322ConditionsLegislation, Policy, Child Abuse, Family and HouseholdArmsResearch-to-Policy Collaboration, Light Touch Policy Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Strengthening School Safety Through Governmental Research-Practice Partnerships: the Arizona School Safety Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Insight for knowledge brokers: factors predicting relationships with federal staffers.Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cutting through the noise during crisis by enhancing the relevance of research to policymakers.Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max CrowleyEdna Bennett Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA. dmc397@psu.edu.
J Taylor Bishop ScottEdna Bennett Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA.
Diana FishbeinEdna Bennett Prevention Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, USA.

Funding

Scientific Meetings for Advancing Economic Analyses of Substance Abuse PreventionR13DA036339 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, KENNETH A · 2014 to 2015
$38k
NIDA NIH HHS R13 DA036339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of basing public policy on sound scientific evidence is increasingly being recognized, yet many barriers continue to slow the translation of prevention research into legislative action. This work reports on the feasibility of a model for overcoming these barriers-known as the Research-to-Policy Collaboration (RPC). The RPC employs strategic legislative needs assessments and a rapid response researcher network to accelerate the translation of research findings into usable knowledge for policymakers. Evaluation findings revealed that this model can successfully mobilize prevention scientists, engage legislative offices, connect policymakers and experts in prevention, and elicit congressional requests for evidence on effective prevention strategies. On average, the RPC model costs $3510 to implement per legislative office. The RPC can elicit requests for evidence at an average cost of $444 per request. The implications of this work, opportunities for optimizing project elements, and plans for future work are discussed. Ultimately, this project signals that the use of scientific knowledge of prevention in policymaking can be greatly augmented through strategic investment in translational efforts.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorEvidence-Based PracticePolicy MakingPreventive Health ServicesTranslational Research, BiomedicalCost-Benefit AnalysisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPilot ProjectsCost-effectivenessEvidence-based policyPreventive interventionTranslational researchUse of evidence

Identifiers

PMID28849362
PMCPMC5803346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.