Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849324›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2018

Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications.

Martina Zanotel, Iliana Bednarova, Viviana Londero, Anna Linda, Michele Lorenzon, Rossano Girometti, Chiara Zuiani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Study on ABUS Applicability for Rural Women With Low Health Resources in China-Large-Scale Population, Non-Opportunistic Screening.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martina ZanotelDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy. martina.zanotel@gmail.com.
Iliana BednarovaDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Viviana LonderoDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Anna LindaDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Michele LorenzonDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Rossano GiromettiDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Chiara ZuianiDepartment of Medical Area, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Udine, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria 'S. Maria della Misericordia', P.le Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) is a recently introduced ultrasonography technique, developed with the purpose to standardize breast ultrasonography and overcome some limitations of handheld ultrasound (HHUS), such as operator dependence and the considerable amount of medical time necessary to perform and interpret HHUS. This new ultrasonography technique separates the moment of image acquisition (that may be performed also by a technician) from that of its interpretation, increasing reproducibility, reducing operator-dependence and physician time. Moreover, multiplanar reconstructions, especially the coronal view, introduce new diagnostic information. ABUS, with those advantages, has the potential to be used as an adjunctive tool to screening mammography, especially in the dense breast, where mammography has a relatively low sensitivity. Women's awareness of risks related to breast density is a hot topic, especially in the USA where legislative breast density notification laws increase the demand for supplemental ultrasound screening. Therefore, ABUS might have the potential to respond to this need. The purpose of this article is to present a summary of current state-of-the-art of ABUS technology and applications, with an emphasis on breast cancer screening. This article discusses also how to overcome some ABUS limitations, in order to be familiar with the new technique.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, MammaryAutomationBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsAutomated breast ultrasoundBreast cancerScreeningUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.