Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849285›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

A small proportion of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia, compared to healthcare-associated cases, in two South African provinces.

O Perovic, A Singh-Moodley, N P Govender, R Kularatne, A Whitelaw, V Chibabhai, P Naicker, N Mbelle, R Lekalakala, V Quan and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial resistance and clonality ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Human-Associated Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

O PerovicCentre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses, National Institute for Communicable Diseases Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, 1 Modderfontein Road, Sandringham, Johannesburg, 2131, South Africa. olgap@nicd.ac.za.
A Singh-MoodleyCentre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses, National Institute for Communicable Diseases Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, 1 Modderfontein Road, Sandringham, Johannesburg, 2131, South Africa.
N P GovenderCentre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses, National Institute for Communicable Diseases Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, 1 Modderfontein Road, Sandringham, Johannesburg, 2131, South Africa.
R KularatneDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology of the University at the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
A WhitelawNational Health Laboratory Service, Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
V ChibabhaiDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Pathology of the University at the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
P NaickerDivision of Medical Microbiology, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town and National Health Laboratory Service, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
N MbelleDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria and National Health Laboratory Service, Pretoria, South Africa.
R LekalakalaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Limpopo and National Health Laboratory Service, Polokwane, South Africa.
V QuanDivision of Public Health Surveillance and Response, National Institute for Communicable Disease, Johannesburg, South Africa.
C SamuelNational Health Laboratory Service, Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
E Van SchalkwykCentre for Healthcare-Associated Infections, Antimicrobial Resistance and Mycoses, National Institute for Communicable Diseases Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, 1 Modderfontein Road, Sandringham, Johannesburg, 2131, South Africa.
for GERMS-SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the proportion of cases of community-associated and healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA, respectively) bacteraemia among patients at five hospitals in the Gauteng and Western Cape provinces in South Africa and described the molecular characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility trends. This was a cross-sectional study using data collected by enhanced surveillance for S. aureus bacteraemia. A total of 2511 cases of S. aureus bacteraemia were identified from January 2013 to January 2016. Among 1914 cases of S. aureus, 557 (29.1%) cases were identified as MRSA infection. Forty-four cases (44/1914 [2.3%] of all S. aureus cases) were considered CA-MRSA infection and 513/1914 (26.8% of all cases) had HA-MRSA infection; the majority were neonates. CA-MRSA constituted 7.9% (44/557) of all cases of MRSA infection. Staphylococcus aureus isolates demonstrated significantly reduced susceptibility to the following classes of antimicrobial agents: macrolides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides and cotrimoxazole, in 2015 compared to 2013 (p < 0.05). Of the 557 MRSA isolates, 484 (87%) were typed for SCCmec elements and spa types: the most common SCCmec type was type III (n = 236, 48.76%), followed by type IV (n = 144, 29.76%). The most common spa types were t037 (n = 229, 47.31%) and t1257 (n = 90, 18.60%). Of 28 isolates selected for multilocus sequence typing (MLST), the most common sequence types (STs) were ST239 and ST612 of clonal complex 8 (CC8) (n = 8 each) and a novel ST (ST4121) was obtained for one isolate. This study demonstrates that S. aureus bacteraemia is common in South African academic centres and characterised by HA-MRSA SCCmec types III and IV. A small proportion of CA-MRSA cases were caused by a few different sequence types.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.