Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849267›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2018

Heart regeneration and the cardiomyocyte cell cycle.

Michael Hesse, Armin Welz, Bernd K Fleischmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Unravelling the Interplay between Cardiac Metabolism and Heart Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Cardiomyocyte-fibroblast crosstalk in the postnatal heart.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael HesseInstitute of Physiology I, Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany. mhesse1@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-0224
Armin WelzDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
Bernd K FleischmannInstitute of Physiology I, Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany. Bernd.Fleischmann@uni-bonn.de.
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease and in particular, heart failure are still main causes of death; therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. Loss of contractile substrate in the heart and limited regenerative capacity of cardiomyocytes are mainly responsible for the poor cardiovascular outcome. This is related to the postmitotic state of differentiated cardiomyocytes, which is partly due to their polyploid nature caused by cell cycle variants. As such, the cardiomyocyte cell cycle is a key player, and its manipulation could be a promising strategy for enhancing the plasticity of the heart by inducing cardiomyocyte proliferation. This review focuses on the cardiac cell cycle and its variants during postnatal growth, the different regenerative responses of the heart in dependance of the developmental stage and on manipulations of the cell cycle. Because a therapeutic goal is to induce authentic cell division in cardiomyocytes, recent experimental approaches following this strategy are also discussed.

Indexed as

Cell CycleRegenerationAnimalsHeartHumansMyocytes, CardiacCardiomyocyteCell growthHeartRegenerationTransgenic animal models

Identifiers

PMID28849267
PMCPMC5780532
OpenAlexW2747822643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.