Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849260›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2017

Marital status and gender affect stage, tumor grade, treatment type and cancer specific mortality in T

Michele Marchioni, Tristan Martel, Marco Bandini, Raisa S Pompe, Zhe Tian, Anil Kapoor, Luca Cindolo, Riccardo Autorino, Alberto Briganti, Shahrokh F Shariat and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Role of Circular RNA in Kidney-Related Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Gender-Related Approach to Kidney Cancer Management: Moving Forward.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michele MarchioniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada. mic.marchioni@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1702-4127
Tristan MartelCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Marco BandiniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Raisa S PompeCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Zhe TianCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Anil KapoorDivision of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Luca CindoloDepartment of Urology, ASL Abruzzo 2, Chieti, Italy.
Riccardo AutorinoDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Luigi SchipsDepartment of Urology, ASL Abruzzo 2, Chieti, Italy.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the effect of marital status and gender on stage at diagnosis, tumor grade, treatment type and cancer specific mortality (CSM) in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

methodsWithin Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2001-2013), we identified 57,700 patients with T

resultsOf all patients, 8.8, 10.6 and 14.8% were, respectively, widowed, separated/divorced and never married. The three categories accounted for 3.9, 9.0 and 14.9% of males (35,641) and for 16.7, 13.1 and 14.7% of females (22,059). Widowed (OR 1.13, p = 0.04), separated/divorced (OR 1.16, p = 0.02) and never married status (OR 1.38, p < 0.001) predisposed to higher rate of no surgical treatment. Widowed (HR 1.32, p < 0.001) and separated/divorced (HR 1.32, p < 0.001) status predisposed to higher CSM. Male gender predisposed to higher T-stage (OR 1.12, p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (OR 1.35, p < 0.001), no surgical treatment (OR 1.23, p < 0.001) and higher CSM (1.13, p = 0.01). Interaction tests between gender and marital status failed to reach independent predictor status in all analyses.

conclusionsMale patients are at higher risk of less favorable baseline characteristics. Additionally, male, widowed and separated/divorced patients exhibit worse cancer control outcomes after treatment for T

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMarital StatusPatient Care ManagementAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNorth AmericaPatient Outcome AssessmentPublic Health SurveillanceGenderMarital statusOncological outcomesRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.