ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019
[Modern coagulation management in bleeding trauma patients : Point-of-care guided administration of coagulation factor concentrates and hemostatic agents].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The thrombelastometry parameter CTEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Basic Principles of Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEMDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Is ROTEM Diagnostic in Trauma Care Associated with Lower Mortality Rates in Bleeding Patients?-A Retrospective Analysis of 7461 Patients Derived from the TraumaRegister DGUJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The European Perspective on the Management of Acute Major Hemorrhage and Coagulopathy after Trauma: Summary of the 2019 Updated European Guideline.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Traumatic Bleeding and Coagulopathy.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUncontrolled bleeding with trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is still the leading cause of preventable death following severe multiple injury. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are associated with improved outcome. Early individualized goal-directed therapy and the use of point-of-care technology may be superior to empiric and ratio-based therapies with conventional blood products. MATERIALS AND
methodsSelective review of the literature considering current recommendations/expert opinion for coagulation management in bleeding trauma patients via individualized goal-directed therapy and the use of viscoelastic point-of-care (ROTEM®)-guided substitution of coagulation factor concentrates and hemostatic agents.
resultsThe administration of fibrinogen concentrate in bleeding trauma patients may be considered if ROTEM®-FIBTEM A10 < 10 mm (FIBTEM A5 < 9 mm; FIBTEM MCF < 12 mm) and EXTEM A10 < 45 mm (EXTEM A5 < 35 mm; EXTEM MCF < 55 mm); the administration of prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) may be considered if signs of delayed coagulation initiation (ROTEM®-EXTEM CT > 80 s). At this stage, no concluding statement can be made for monitoring or treatment guidance with factor XIII by using point-of-care technology. Viscoelastic assays display high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of hyperfibrinolysis with subsequent administration of an antifibrinolytic.
conclusionsIndividualized therapeutic concepts based upon viscoelastic point-of-care (ROTEM®) assays present an alternative to empiric and ratio-based therapies with conventional blood products in bleeding trauma patients and may be associated with reduced need for allogenic blood products and morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28849255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.