Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28849066›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2017

WRAP53β, survivin and p16INK4a expression as potential predictors of radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy response in T2N0-T3N0 glottic laryngeal cancer.

Katharina Tiefenböck-Hansson, Aaro Haapaniemi, Lovisa Farnebo, Björn Palmgren, Jussi Tarkkanen, Marianne Farnebo, Eva Munck-Wikland, Antti Mäkitie, Stina Garvin, Karin Roberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Role of WRAP53 in Cell Homeostasis and Carcinogenesis Onset.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Non-canonical roles of canonical telomere binding proteins in cancers.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic factors in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2020
    Review
  11. Different patterns of p16INK4a immunohistochemical expression and their biological implications in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina Tiefenböck-HanssonDivision of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Aaro HaapaniemiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lovisa FarneboDivision of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Björn PalmgrenDivision of ENT Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jussi TarkkanenDepartment of Pathology, HUSLAB, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Marianne FarneboDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Centrum Karolinska (CCK), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eva Munck-WiklandDivision of ENT Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antti MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Stina GarvinDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Karin RobergDivision of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEHelsinki University Hospital · FIKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current treatment recommendation for T2-3N0M0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the Nordic countries comprises of radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Tumor radiosensitivity varies and another option is primary surgical treatment, which underlines the need for predictive markers in this patient population. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation of the proteins WRAP53β, survivin and p16INK4a to RT/CRT response and ultimate outcome of patients with T2-T3N0 glottic SCC. Protein expression was determined using immunohistochemistry on tumors from 149 patients consecutively treated with RT or CRT at Helsinki University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, and Linköping University Hospital during 1999-2010. Our results demonstrate a significantly better 5-year relapse-free survival, disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival and overall survival of patients with T3N0 tumors treated with CRT compared with RT alone. Patients with tumors showing a cytoplasmic staining of WRAP53β revealed significantly worse DFS compared with those with nuclear staining. For survivin, we observed a trend towards better 5-year DFS in patients with strong nuclear survivin expression compared with those with weak nuclear survivin expression (p=0.091). Eleven (7%) tumors showed p16 positivity, with predilection to younger patients, and this age group of patients with p16-positive SCC had a significantly better DFS compared with patients with p16-negative SCC. Taken together, our results highlight WRAP53β as a potential biomarker for predicting RT/CRT response in T2-T3N0 glottic SCC. p16 may identify a small but distinct group of glottic SCC with favorable outcome. Furthermore, for T3N0 patients better outcome was observed following CRT compared to RT alone.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16FemaleGlottisHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsLaryngeal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular ChaperonesAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBIRC5 protein, humanCDKN2A protein, humanCisplatinCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Inhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesSurvivinTelomeraseWRAP53 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28849066
PMCPMC5652956
OpenAlexW2742948548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.