Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28848777›Full record

ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2017

Impact of Personalised Patient Education on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.

Luís Elvas, Daniel Brito, Miguel Areia, Rita Carvalho, Susana Alves, Sandra Saraiva, Ana T Cadime

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07664800 (The Effect of Nurse-Delivered Online Counseling on Invasive Pain, Anxiety, and Comfort Levels in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07664800 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Nurse-Delivered Online Counseling on Invasive Pain, Anxiety, and Comfort Levels in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanko UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsColonoscopy (Procedure), 18 Years and Over, Literacy, No Communication DifficultiesArmsOnline Nursing Counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Quality in Colonoscopy: Beyond the Adenoma Detection Rate Fever.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Article
  15. Bowel Prep: Nurses Do It Better.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luís ElvasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Daniel BritoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Miguel AreiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Rita CarvalhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Susana AlvesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Sandra SaraivaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ana T CadimeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate bowel preparation is one of the most important quality factors of colonoscopy. Our goal was to analyse the impact of personalised patient education on bowel cleansing preparation for colonoscopy.

methodsWe performed a single-blinded, single-centre, prospective randomised trial, where patients were either allocated to a control group, where they received some predefined oral and written information on bowel preparation from the gastroenterologist, or to an intervention group, where patients received additional personalised instructions for bowel preparation and diet from a nurse. The primary outcome was the quality of bowel preparation (Aronchick scale).

resultsA total of 229 patients were randomised; 113 to the control group and 116 to the intervention group. In intention-to-treat analysis, bowel preparation was adequate in 62% (95% CI 53-70) of colonoscopies in the intervention group and in 35% (95% CI 26-44) of colonoscopies in the control group (

conclusionsPersonalised patient education on bowel preparation for colonoscopy significantly improved the quality of bowel preparation.

Indexed as

Bowel preparationColonoscopyPatient educationQuality

Identifiers

PMID28848777
PMCPMC5553375
OpenAlexW2565510326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.