ArticleVeterinary record open2017
Veterinary pharmacovigilance in Europe: a survey of veterinary practitioners.
Article in Veterinary record open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 'One Health' cross-sectional analysis of reports of potential antibiotic resistance cases in international pharmacovigilance databases.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A comparison of antibiotic resistance reports in pharmacovigilance databases and conventional surveillance across "One Health".Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Developing electronic health records as a source of real-world data for veterinary pharmacoepidemiology.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- A narrative review of veterinary pharmacovigilance situations and prospects in East African countries.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- A review of adverse events in animals and children after secondary exposure to transdermal hormone-containing medicinal products.Veterinary record open · 2022Review
- UK veterinary professionals' perceptions and experiences of adverse drug reaction reporting.The Veterinary record · 2022Article
- A survey of veterinary professionals in Sweden: Adverse event reporting and access to product safety information.Veterinary record open · 2021Article
- Veterinary pharmacovigilance in sub-Sahara Africa context: a pilot study of adverse reactions to veterinary medicine in Cameroon.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- An e-Reporting Tool for Facilitating Submission of Veterinary Adverse Drug Reaction Reports.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
- Clinical audit of POM-V / POM prescriptions by remote consultation via a veterinary video telemedicine smartphone application.Veterinary evidenceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A web-based survey was conducted by the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe with the support of the European Medicines Agency to gain a better insight into the adverse event reporting habits of veterinary practitioners and the level of information on reported adverse events that flows back to them. It was completed by 3545 veterinarians. The findings indicate marked under-reporting and that the system is poorly equipped to deal with lack of expected efficacy, with few cases reported and most found to be inconclusive. It was also found that feedback systems are greatly lacking. In order to increase spontaneous reporting, there is a need to make reporting easier (eg, by developing mobile apps, to incorporate the reporting into the practice management system software) and to make veterinarians better aware of the importance of reporting and the added value it may bring. Feedback systems should be improved. The best way to motivate reporters is to demonstrate that the reports they submit are indeed useful and contribute to the improved use of veterinary medicinal products. The major role veterinarians can play in improving animal health, welfare and public health by reporting adverse events needs to be further promoted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.