Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28848238›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2017

A microfluidics-based in situ chemotaxis assay to study the behaviour of aquatic microbial communities.

Bennett S Lambert, Jean-Baptiste Raina, Vicente I Fernandez, Christian Rinke, Nachshon Siboni, Francesco Rubino, Philip Hugenholtz, Gene W Tyson, Justin R Seymour, Roman Stocker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Slower swimming promotes chemotactic encounters between bacteria and small phytoplankton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The ecological roles of bacterial chemotaxis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bennett S LambertDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-3255
Jean-Baptiste RainaClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007, NSW, Australia.
Vicente I FernandezDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Christian RinkeAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4632-1187
Nachshon SiboniClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6082-0949
Francesco RubinoAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-6794
Philip HugenholtzAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-7925
Gene W TysonAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072, QLD, Australia.
Justin R SeymourClimate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, 2007, NSW, Australia.
Roman StockerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. romanstocker@ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3199-0508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial interactions influence the productivity and biogeochemistry of the ocean, yet they occur in miniscule volumes that cannot be sampled by traditional oceanographic techniques. To investigate the behaviours of marine microorganisms at spatially relevant scales, we engineered an in situ chemotaxis assay (ISCA) based on microfluidic technology. Here, we describe the fabrication, testing and first field results of the ISCA, demonstrating its value in accessing the microbial behaviours that shape marine ecosystems.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaWater MicrobiologyAquatic OrganismsBacteriaChemotaxisDNA, BacterialEcosystemMicrobial InteractionsMicrofluidicsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalOceans and SeasRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSeawaterSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.