ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Null effects of boot camps and short-format training for PhD students in life sciences.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Web of TPD Reform: a reflective tool for analyzing and improving teaching professional development programs for teaching assistants.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- Not just an afterthought: the essentiality of professional development for STEM teaching assistants.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- A discipline-specific pedagogical professional development graduate program fosters development of integrated scholars: an evaluation of the Future Undergraduate Science Educators (FUSE) program.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- There's never been a better time to be a STEM educator.Genetics · 2025Article
- Modular, focused data science education improves biomedical learners' abilities: A study of the Data and Analytics for Research Training (DART) program.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Preparing Teaching Assistants to Facilitate Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) in the Biological Sciences: A Call to Action.CBE life sciences education · 2023Article
- An international consensus on effective, inclusive, and career-spanning short-format training in the life sciences and beyond.PloS one · 2023Article
- Shut Up & Write!® builds writing self-efficacy and self-regulation in early-career researchers.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Capacity building for whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and bioinformatics in high TB burden countries.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Data science in cell imaging.Journal of cell science · 2021Review
- An integrated, modular approach to data science education in microbiology.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Using data to make the case for program resources and sustainability: the BEST action inventory case study.SN social sciences · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for organizing a data science workshop.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Ten simple rules to increase computational skills among biologists with Code Clubs.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- A framework to assess the quality and impact of bioinformatics training across ELIXIR.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Incubators: Building community networks and developing open educational resources to integrate bioinformatics into life science education.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2020Article
- Ad hoc efforts for advancing data science education.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Successful Integration of Data Science in Undergraduate Biostatistics Courses Using Cognitive Load Theory.CBE life sciences education · 2019Article
- Article
- The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: A tool to support design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many PhD programs incorporate boot camps and summer bridge programs to accelerate the development of doctoral students' research skills and acculturation into their respective disciplines. These brief, high-intensity experiences span no more than several weeks and are typically designed to expose graduate students to data analysis techniques, to develop scientific writing skills, and to better embed incoming students into the scholarly community. However, there is no previous study that directly measures the outcomes of PhD students who participate in such programs and compares them to the outcomes of students who did not participate. Likewise, no previous study has used a longitudinal design to assess these outcomes over time. Here we show that participation in such programs is not associated with detectable benefits related to skill development, socialization into the academic community, or scholarly productivity for students in our sample. Analyzing data from 294 PhD students in the life sciences from 53 US institutions, we found no statistically significant differences in outcomes between participants and nonparticipants across 115 variables. These results stand in contrast to prior studies presenting boot camps as effective interventions based on participant satisfaction and perceived value. Many universities and government agencies (e.g., National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation) invest substantial resources in boot camp and summer bridge activities in the hopes of better supporting scientific workforce development. Our findings do not reveal any measurable benefits to students, indicating that an allocation of limited resources to alternative strategies with stronger empirical foundations warrants consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.