Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28847917›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2017

Heterogeneous Binding and Central Nervous System Distribution of the Multitargeted Kinase Inhibitor Ponatinib Restrict Orthotopic Efficacy in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Glioblastoma.

Janice K Laramy, Minjee Kim, Shiv K Gupta, Karen E Parrish, Shuangling Zhang, Katrina K Bakken, Brett L Carlson, Ann C Mladek, Daniel J Ma, Jann N Sarkaria and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH-Wild-type Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Tumor Drug Concentration and Phosphoproteomic Profiles After Two Weeks of Treatment With Sunitinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Factors Influencing Luciferase-Based Bioluminescent Imaging in Preclinical Models of Brain Tumor.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cancers · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Lycorine inhibits glioblastoma multiforme growth through EGFR suppression.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Janice K LaramyBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Minjee KimBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Shiv K GuptaBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Karen E ParrishBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Shuangling ZhangBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Katrina K BakkenBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Brett L CarlsonBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Ann C MladekBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Daniel J MaBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
Jann N SarkariaBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.).
William F ElmquistBrain Barriers Research Center, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (J.K.L., M.K., K.E.P., S.Z., W.F.E.) and Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (S.K.G., K.K.B., B.L.C., A.C.M., D.J.M., J.N.S.) elmqu011@umn.edu.

Funding

Targeted MV-CEA as a Potent Antitumor Agent against GBMP50CA108961 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI O'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICK · 2004 to 2015
$22.5M
Trans Network ProjectU54CA210180 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SARKARIA, JANN N. · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
Targeting Kif11 to Treat Glioblastoma Invasion and ProliferationR01NS073610 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI CANOLL, PETER, ELMQUIST, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
Influence of Anti-Angiogenic Therapy on Drug Delivery to Brain TumorsR01NS077921 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELMQUIST, WILLIAM, SARKARIA, JANN N. · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
Improving Delivery of Molecularly-Targeted Therapy to Invasive Glioma CellsR01CA138437 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ELMQUIST, WILLIAM, OHLFEST, JOHN R · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108961NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138437NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210180NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073610NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated how differences in drug distribution and free fraction at different tumor and tissue sites influence the efficacy of the multikinase inhibitor ponatinib in a patient-derived xenograft model of glioblastoma (GBM). Efficacy studies in GBM6 flank (heterotopic) and intracranial (orthotopic) models showed that ponatinib is effective in the flank but not in the intracranial model, despite a relatively high brain-to-plasma ratio. In vitro binding studies indicated that flank tumor had a higher free (unbound) drug fraction than normal brain. The total and free drug concentrations, along with the tissue-to-plasma ratio (Kp) and its unbound derivative (Kp,uu), were consistently higher in the flank tumor than the normal brain at 1 and 6 hours after a single dose in GBM6 flank xenografts. In the orthotopic xenografts, the intracranial tumor core displayed higher Kp and Kp,uu values compared with the brain-around-tumor (BAT). The free fractions and the total drug concentrations, hence free drug concentrations, were consistently higher in the core than in the BAT at 1 and 6 hours postdose. The delivery disadvantages in the brain and BAT were further evidenced by the low total drug concentrations in these areas that did not consistently exceed the in vitro cytotoxic concentration (IC

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBrainBrain NeoplasmsCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGlioblastomaHEK293 CellsHumansImidazolesMaleMiceMice, NudeProtein BindingProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsImidazolesponatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridazines

Identifiers

PMID28847917
PMCPMC5625285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.