Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28847808›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2017

Selective Modulation of Orbitofrontal Network Activity during Negative Occasion Setting.

Justin L Shobe, Konstantin I Bakhurin, Leslie D Claar, Sotiris C Masmanidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ambiguity drives higher-order Pavlovian learning.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Occasion setting.Behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin L ShobeDepartment of Neurobiology, jshobe@gmail.com smasmanidis@ucla.edu.
Konstantin I BakhurinNeuroscience Interdepartmental Program.
Leslie D ClaarDepartment of Bioengineering, and.ORCID 0000-0002-4030-9171
Sotiris C MasmanidisDepartment of Neurobiology, jshobe@gmail.com smasmanidis@ucla.edu.

Funding

Training Program in Neural MicrocircuitsT32NS058280 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FELDMAN, JACK L · 2007 to 2017
$2.4M
Systems-level electrophysiology for addiction and reward researchR01DA034178 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MASMANIDIS, SOTIRIS · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
CRCNS: Network mechanisms of the learning and encoding of timed motor responsesR01NS100050 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUONOMANO, DEAN V, MASMANIDIS, SOTIRIS · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034178NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS100050NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS058280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrete cues can gain powerful control over behavior to help an animal anticipate and cope with upcoming events. This is important in conditions where understanding the relationship between complex stimuli provides a means to resolving situational ambiguity. However, it is unclear how cortical circuits generate and maintain these signals that conditionally regulate behavior. To address this, we established a Pavlovian serial feature-negative conditioning paradigm, where male mice are trained on a trial in which a conditioned stimulus (CS) is presented alone and followed by reward, or a feature-negative trial in which the CS is preceded by a feature cue indicating there is no reward. Mice learn to respond with anticipatory licking to a solitary CS, but significantly suppress their responding to the same cue during feature-negative trials. We show that the feature cue forms a selective association with its paired CS, because the ability of the feature to transfer its suppressive properties to a separately rewarded cue is limited. Next, to examine the underlying neural dynamics, we conduct recordings in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). We find that the feature cue significantly and selectively inhibits CS-evoked activity. Finally, we find that the feature triggers a distinct OFC network state during the delay period between the feature and CS, establishing a potential link between the feature and future events. Together, our findings suggest that OFC dynamics are modulated by the feature cue and its associated conditioned stimulus in a manner consistent with an occasion setting model.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalAnimalsCuesEvoked PotentialsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrefrontal CortexReaction TimeRewardnegative occasion settingorbitofrontal cortexsingle-unit electrophysiology

Identifiers

PMID28847808
PMCPMC5618261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.