Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28847775›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2017

Epidemiology of adult overweight recording and management by UK GPs: a systematic review.

Joanna C McLaughlin, Kathryn Hamilton, Ruth Kipping

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Value of measuring waist circumference in primary care: a mixed-methods study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Obese individuals do not underreport dietary intake to a greater extent than nonobese individuals when data are allometrically-scaled.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  14. Consulting Obese and Overweight Patients for Nutrition and Physical Activity in Primary Healthcare in Poland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna C McLaughlinSouth West Public Health Training Programme.
Kathryn HamiltonSouth West Public Health Training Programme.
Ruth KippingSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care guidelines for managing adult overweight/obesity recommend routine measurement of body mass index (BMI) and the offer of weight management interventions. Many studies state that this is rarely done, but the extent to which overweight/obesity is recognised, considered, and documented in routine care has not been determined.

aimTo identify the epidemiology of adult overweight documentation and management by UK GPs. DESIGN AND

settingA systematic review of studies since 2006 from eight electronic databases and grey literature.

methodIncluded studies measured the proportion of adult patients with documented BMI or weight loss intervention offers in routine primary care in the UK. A narrative synthesis reports the prevalence and pattern of the outcomes.

resultsIn total, 2845 articles were identified, and seven were included; four with UK-wide data and three with regional-level data. The proportion of patients with a documented BMI was 58-79% (28-37% within a year). For overweight/obese patients alone, 43-52% had a recent BMI record, and 15-42% had a documented intervention offer. BMI documentation was positively associated with older age, female sex, higher BMI, coexistent chronic disease, and higher deprivation.

conclusionBMI is under-recorded and weight loss interventions are under-referred for primary care adult patients in the UK despite the obesity register in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). The review identified likely underserved groups such as younger males and otherwise healthy overweight/obese individuals to whom attention should now be directed. The proposed amendment to the obesity register QOF could prompt improvements but has not been adopted for 2017.

Indexed as

General PractitionersGuideline AdherencePrimary Health CareAdultBody Mass IndexDocumentationHumansOverweightPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationUnited Kingdombody mass indexgeneral practiceobesityprimary health careweight recording

Identifiers

PMID28847775
PMCPMC5604831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.