ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2017
Usefulness of Released Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implications of S-glutathionylation of sarcomere proteins in cardiac disorders, therapies, and diagnosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Reduced Plasma Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein-C Concentrations in Cats with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Evidence from Chronic, Treated Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Preparation of Optical-Based Sensors for the Determination of Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of point-of-care testing for cardiac myosin-binding protein C in early risk assessment of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cardiac myosin-binding protein C: potential early biomarker of myocardial injury in coronary artery bypass surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Cardiac biomarkers in athletes and active individuals: a clinical review of exercise-induced elevations and diagnostic interpretation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Cardiac myosin-binding protein-C levels are associated with severity and prognosis in stable coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Role of Cardiac Troponin and Other Emerging Biomarkers Among Athletes and Beyond: Underlying Mechanisms, Differential Diagnosis, and Guide for Interpretation.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Reference values and biological determinants for cardiac myosin-binding protein C concentrations assessed with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict the Future Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Biomarkers of Inflammation in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction.Disease markers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiac myosin binding protein-C (cMyBP-C) is a heart muscle-specific thick filament protein. Elevated level of serum cMyBP-C is an indicator of early myocardial infarction (MI), but its value as a predictor of future cardiovascular disease is unknown. Based on the presence of significant amount of cMyBP-C in the serum of previous study subjects independent of MI, we hypothesized that circulating cMyBP-C is a sensitive indicator of ongoing cardiovascular stress and disease. To test this hypothesis, 75 men and 83 women of similar ages were recruited for a prospective study. They underwent exercise stress echocardiography to provide pre- and poststress blood samples for subsequent determination of serum cMyBP-C levels. The subjects were followed for 1 to 1.5 years. Exercise stress increased serum cMyBP-C in all subjects. Twenty-seven primary events (such as death, MI, revascularization, invasive cardiovascular procedure, or cardiovascular-related hospitalization) and 7 critical events (CE; such as death, MI, stroke, or pulmonary embolism) occurred. After adjusting for sex and cardiovascular risk factors with multivariate Cox regression, a 96% sensitive prestress cMyBP-C threshold carried a hazard ratio of 8.1 with p = 0.041 for primary events. Most subjects (6 of 7) who had CE showed normal ejection fraction on echocardiography. Prestress cMyBP-C demonstrated area under receiver operating curve of 0.91 and multivariate Cox regression hazard ratio of 13.8 (p = 0.000472) for CE. Thus, basal cMyBP-C levels reflected susceptibility for a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Together with its high sensitivity, cMyBP-C holds potential as a screening biomarker for the existence of severe cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.