Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28847500›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2017

Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Brandon L Helfield, Xucai Chen, Bin Qin, Simon C Watkins, Flordeliza S Villanueva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.Advanced materials technologies · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery and Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brandon L HelfieldCenter for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Xucai ChenCenter for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bin QinCenter for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Simon C WatkinsCenter for Biologic Imaging, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Flordeliza S VillanuevaCenter for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: villanuevafs@upmc.edu.

Funding

Ultrasound-activated microbubbles for targeted siRNA delivery to tumorR01EB016516 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VILLANUEVA, FLORDELIZA S · 2012 to 2015
$2.3M
Targeted Drug Delivery Using Liposomes, Microbubbles and UltrasoundR21EB019582 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VILLANUEVA, FLORDELIZA S · 2016 to 2017
$424k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016516NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB019582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sonoporation is emerging as a feasible, non-viral gene delivery platform for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and cancer. Despite promising results, this approach remains less efficient than viral methods. The objective of this work is to help substantiate the merit of polymeric microbubble sonoporation as a non-viral, localized cell permeation and payload delivery strategy by taking a ground-up approach to elucidating the fundamental mechanisms at play. In this study, we apply simultaneous microscopy of polymeric microbubble sonoporation over its intrinsic biophysical timescales-with sub-microsecond resolution to examine microbubble cavitation and millisecond resolution over several minutes to examine local macromolecule uptake through enhanced endothelial cell membrane permeability-bridging over six orders of magnitude in time. We quantified microbubble behavior and resulting sonoporation thresholds at transmit frequencies of 0.5, 1 and 2 MHz, and determined that sonic cracking is a necessary but insufficient condition to induce sonoporation. Further, sonoporation propensity increases with the extent of sonic cracking, namely, from partial to complete gas escape from the polymeric encapsulation. For the subset that exhibited complete gas escape from sonic cracking, a proportional relationship between the maximum projected gas area and resulting macromolecule uptake was observed. These results have revealed one aspect of polymeric bubble activity on the microsecond time scale that is associated with eliciting sonoporation in adjacent endothelial cells, and contributes toward an understanding of the physical rationale for sonoporation with polymer-encapsulated microbubble contrast agents.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesPolymersUltrasonic WavesCell Culture TechniquesCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityContrast MediaEndothelial CellsHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningSonicationContrast MediaPolymersEndothelial cellsHigh-speed imagingMicrobubblesSonic crackingSonoporation

Identifiers

PMID28847500
PMCPMC5644032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.