ArticlePhysiology & behavior2018
Discriminative control by deprivation states and external cues in male and female rats.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vulnerability of the Hippocampus to Insults: Links to Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Hypothalamic control of interoceptive hunger.Current biology : CB · 2021Article
- The Cognitive Control of Eating and Body Weight: It's More Than What You "Think".Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Considering sex differences in the cognitive controls of feeding.Physiology & behavior · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research indicates that decisions about when to eat in response to food cues in the environment are based on interoceptive energy states (i.e., hunger and fullness) and learning about and remembering prior eating experiences. However, this animal model has exclusively been tested on male rodents. Despite evidence that women are more susceptible to obesity and cognitive disorders associated with excess weight (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) than men, the generality of these findings with males to females remains unknown. To address this gap, the current research investigated associative learning mechanisms involved in food intake control in females by training both males and females in a Pavlovian deprivation discrimination in which varying levels of food deprivation are trained with competitive external cues to signal reward. In Experiment 1, male and female rats showed similar performance in discriminating between 0 and 24h deprivation state/external cue compounds and in subsequent tests, confirming stimulus control by deprivation states. Experiment 2 assessed learning about more ecologically valid 0 and 4h deprivation states in competition with external cues in both males and females. With the low-level deprivation state parameters, females outperformed males in discriminative control by deprivation states, particularly on the contingency rewarded under satiation and not deprivation. While females showed an enhanced degree of energy state processing under some deprivation conditions, overall, these findings suggest similar mechanisms of learned appetitive control in both sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.