Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28847483›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2018

Discriminative control by deprivation states and external cues in male and female rats.

Camille H Sample, Sabrina Jones, Farris Dwider, Terry L Davidson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camille H SampleCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: csample@american.edu.
Sabrina JonesCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Farris DwiderCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Terry L DavidsonCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
American University · US

Funding

SIGNALS TO FEED: BIOLOGICAL AND ASSOCIATIVE MECHANISMSR01HD028792 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI DAVIDSON, TERRY L · 1991 to 2014
$2.2M
Signals to Feed: Biological and Associative MechanismsR01DK110412 · NIDDK · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, TERRY L · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD028792NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110412NIH HHS R01DK110412NIH HHS R01HD028792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research indicates that decisions about when to eat in response to food cues in the environment are based on interoceptive energy states (i.e., hunger and fullness) and learning about and remembering prior eating experiences. However, this animal model has exclusively been tested on male rodents. Despite evidence that women are more susceptible to obesity and cognitive disorders associated with excess weight (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) than men, the generality of these findings with males to females remains unknown. To address this gap, the current research investigated associative learning mechanisms involved in food intake control in females by training both males and females in a Pavlovian deprivation discrimination in which varying levels of food deprivation are trained with competitive external cues to signal reward. In Experiment 1, male and female rats showed similar performance in discriminating between 0 and 24h deprivation state/external cue compounds and in subsequent tests, confirming stimulus control by deprivation states. Experiment 2 assessed learning about more ecologically valid 0 and 4h deprivation states in competition with external cues in both males and females. With the low-level deprivation state parameters, females outperformed males in discriminative control by deprivation states, particularly on the contingency rewarded under satiation and not deprivation. While females showed an enhanced degree of energy state processing under some deprivation conditions, overall, these findings suggest similar mechanisms of learned appetitive control in both sexes.

Indexed as

CuesSex CharacteristicsAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalDiscrimination LearningEatingFemaleFood DeprivationMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAppetitiveEnergy regulationLearningObesitySatietySex differences

Identifiers

PMID28847483
PMCPMC6417102
OpenAlexW2749292429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.