Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran use in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon.

backgroundData are limited on the safety of periprocedural anticoagulation with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the second-generation cryoballoon (CB) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that the incidence of acute periprocedural complications in patients undergoing PVI do not differ between patients treated with VKA compared to NOACs.

methodsIn 200 consecutive patients (mean age, 64.3 _ 10.6 years; female, n = 83) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, PVI using the second-generation 28-mm CB was performed. In patients treated with NOACs, the medication was stopped the day of the procedure and continued the evening after the procedure with a reduced dosage. Patients treated with phenprocoumon were continued on uninterrupted phenprocoumon with a target INR of 2 to 3. If INR was <2, bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin was performed.

resultsForty-seven of 200 patients (23.5%) were treated with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and 55 (27.5%) were treated with apixaban, 67 (33.5%) with rivaroxaban, and 31 (15.5%) with dabigatran. Seven (3.5%) major complications occurred in the overall population. Major bleeding complications did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (P = 0.23). One patient taking VKA had a pericardial tamponade at the end of the procedure; 2 patients treated with apixaban developed a groin hematoma requiring surgical intervention. Transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 patient of the apixaban and rivaroxaban group.

conclusionsApixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran, compared with uninterrupted VKA, did not show a higher risk for major bleeding or ischemic complications in patients undergoing PVI using the second-generation CB.