Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28846763›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2017

Functional Outcome After Intracranial Pressure Monitoring for Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Tellen D Bennett, Peter E DeWitt, Tom H Greene, Rajendu Srivastava, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Michael L Nance, Susan L Bratton, Desmond K Runyan, J Michael Dean, Heather T Keenan

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Management of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients: an evidence-based approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Utility of intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a propensity score matching analysis of TQIP data.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Optic nerve sheath diameter does not correlate with intracranial pressure in pediatric neurocritical care patients.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Non-invasive estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in children with severe traumatic brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  16. Predictors of intracranial hypertension in children undergoing ICP monitoring after severe traumatic brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Tellen D BennettPediatric Critical Care, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Peter E DeWittBioinformatics and Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora.
Tom H GreeneDivision of Biostatistics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Rajendu SrivastavaPediatric Inpatient Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Jay Riva-CambrinDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary and Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael L NanceDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia.
Susan L BrattonPediatric Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Desmond K RunyanDepartment of Pediatrics, Kempe Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
J Michael DeanPediatric Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Heather T KeenanPediatric Critical Care, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
University of Utah · USAlberta Children's Hospital · CAChildren's Hospital Colorado · USColorado School of Public Health · USIntermountain Healthcare · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Effectiveness of ICP Monitoring in Pediatric Traumatic Brain InjuryK23HD074620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BENNETT, TELLEN · 2013 to 2017
$701k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a mainstay of therapy for children with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but its overall association with patient outcome is unclear. Objective: To test the hypothesis that ICP monitoring is associated with improved functional survival of children with severe TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: A propensity-weighted effectiveness analysis was conducted using 2 linked national databases with data from 30 US children's hospitals from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012, on 3084 children with severe TBI. Clinical events including neurosurgical procedures were identified using validated computable phenotypes. Data analysis was conducted from September 1, 2016, to March 1, 2017. Exposure: Placement of an ICP monitor. Main Outcomes and Measures: A composite of hospital mortality, discharge to hospice, or survival with placement of new tracheostomy and gastrostomy tubes. Results: Of the 3084 children in the study (1128 girls and 1956 boys; mean [SD] age, 7.03 [5.44] years), 1002 (32.4%) underwent ICP monitoring, with substantial hospital variation (6% to 50% by hospital). Overall, 484 children (15.7%) experienced the primary composite outcome. A propensity approach using matching weights generated good covariate balance between those who did and those who did not undergo ICP monitoring. Using a propensity-weighted logistic regression model clustered by hospital, no statistically significant difference was found in functional survival between monitored and unmonitored patients (odds ratio of poor outcome among those who underwent ICP monitoring, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.74). In a prespecified secondary analysis, no difference in mortality was found (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89-1.50). Prespecified subgroup analyses of children younger and older than 2 years of age and among those with unintentional and inflicted (intentional) injuries also showed no difference in outcome with ICP monitoring. Conclusions and Relevance: With the use of linked national data and validated computable phenotypes, no evidence was found of a benefit from ICP monitoring on functional survival of children with severe TBI. Intracranial pressure monitoring is a widely but inconsistently used technology with incompletely demonstrated effectiveness. A large prospective cohort study or randomized trial is needed.

Indexed as

Intracranial PressureAdolescentBrain Injuries, TraumaticChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfantLength of StayMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicPatient DischargePropensity ScoreSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID28846763
PMCPMC5710627
OpenAlexW2747727134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.