Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28846163›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2018

Long-term efficacy and safety of sonidegib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma: 30-month analysis of the randomized phase 2 BOLT study.

J T Lear, M R Migden, K D Lewis, A L S Chang, A Guminski, R Gutzmer, L Dirix, P Combemale, A Stratigos, R Plummer and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01327053 (Phase II, Randomized Double-blind Study of Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of LDE225 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 81 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01327053 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II, Randomized Double-blind Study of Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of LDE225 in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2011 to 2018Enrolled230ConditionsBasal Cell CarcinomaArmsLDE225
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. S2k guideline basal cell carcinoma of the skin (update 2023).Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Swiss Recommendations for Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Secondary resistance to sonidegib is rare in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Images in Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology: Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2024
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 8 countries.

J T LearManchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
M R MigdenDepartments of Dermatology and Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
K D LewisDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
A L S ChangStanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA.
A GuminskiRoyal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
R GutzmerMedizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
L DirixSint-Augustinus Ziekenhuis, Antwerp, Belgium.
P CombemaleAnti Cancer Institute, Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
A StratigosAndreas Syggros Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
R PlummerNorthern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
H CastroNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
T YiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
M MoneNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
J ZhouNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
U TrefzerDermatologikum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
M KaatzUniversity Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
C LoquaiUniversity Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
R KudchadkarWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
D SellamiNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
R DummerUniversitätsSpital Zürich-Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Novartis (United States) · USAndreas Sygros Hospital · GRBristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) · DECentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon · FRDermatologikum Hamburg · DEEmory University · USFreeman Hospital · GBGZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus · BEJena University Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERoche (Switzerland) · CHRoyal North Shore Hospital · AUStanford University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) or metastatic BCC (mBCC), two difficult-to-treat populations, have had limited treatment options. Sonidegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), was approved in laBCC based on results from the BOLT trial.

objectiveTo evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of sonidegib in laBCC and mBCC in the BOLT 18- and 30-month analyses.

methodsBOLT (NCT01327053, ClinicalTrials.gov), a double-blind phase 2 study, enrolled patients from July 2011 until January 2013. Eligible HPI-treatment-naïve patients with laBCC not amenable to curative surgery/radiotherapy or mBCC were randomized 1 : 2 to sonidegib 200 mg (laBCC, n = 66; mBCC, n = 13) or 800 mg (laBCC, n = 128; mBCC, n = 23). Tumour response was assessed per central and investigator review.

resultsWith 30 months of follow-up, among patients treated with sonidegib 200 mg (approved dose), objective response rates were 56.1% (central) and 71.2% (investigator) in laBCC and 7.7% (central) and 23.1% (investigator) in mBCC. Tumour responses were durable as follows: median duration of response was 26.1 months (central) and 15.7 months (investigator) in laBCC and 24.0 months (central) and 18.1 months (investigator) in mBCC. Five patients with laBCC and three with mBCC in the 200-mg arm died. Median overall survival was not reached in either population; 2-year overall survival rates were 93.2% (laBCC) and 69.3% (mBCC). In laBCC, efficacy was similar regardless of aggressive or non-aggressive histology. Sonidegib 200 mg continued to have a better safety profile than 800 mg, with lower rates of grade 3/4 adverse events (43.0% vs. 64.0%) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (30.4% vs. 40.0%).

conclusionSonidegib continued to demonstrate long-term efficacy and safety in these populations. These data support the use of sonidegib 200 mg per local treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBasal Cell CarcinomaBiphenyl CompoundsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHedgehog ProteinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPyridinesSkin NeoplasmsSurvival RateAntineoplastic AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsHedgehog ProteinsPyridinessonidegib

Identifiers

PMID28846163
PMCPMC5873455
OpenAlexW2747660904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.