Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28846115›Full record

ArticleOncogene2017

CUT-PCR: CRISPR-mediated, ultrasensitive detection of target DNA using PCR.

S H Lee, J Yu, G-H Hwang, S Kim, H S Kim, S Ye, K Kim, J Park, D Y Park, Y-K Cho and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Rapid and Simple Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

S H LeeCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, South Korea.
J YuSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
G-H HwangDepartment of Chemistry, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
S KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, South Korea.
H S KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, South Korea.
S YeCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, South Korea.
K KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, South Korea.
J ParkCenter for Soft and Living Matter, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, South Korea.
D Y ParkDepartment of Pathology, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Y-K ChoCenter for Soft and Living Matter, Institute for Basic Science, Ulsan, South Korea.
J-S KimCenter for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul, South Korea.
S BaeDepartment of Chemistry, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3615-8566
Institute for Basic Science · KRSeoul National University · KRHanyang University · KRPusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a tumor-specific biomarker for the early detection of various cancers. To date, several techniques have been devised to enrich the extremely small amounts of ctDNA present in plasma, but they are still insufficient for cancer diagnosis, especially at the early stage. Here, we developed a novel method, CUT (CRISPR-mediated, Ultrasensitive detection of Target DNA)-PCR, which uses CRISPR endonucleases to enrich and detect the extremely small amounts of tumor DNA fragments among the much more abundant wild-type DNA fragments by specifically eliminating the wild-type sequences. We computed that by using various orthologonal CRISPR endonucleases such as SpCas9 and FnCpf1, the CUT-PCR method would be applicable to 80% of known cancer-linked substitution mutations registered in the COSMIC database. We further verified that CUT-PCR together with targeted deep sequencing enables detection of a broad range of oncogenes with high sensitivity (<0.01%) and accuracy, which is superior to conventional targeted deep sequencing. In the end, we successfully applied CUT-PCR to detect sequences with oncogenic mutations in the ctDNA of colorectal cancer patients' blood, suggesting that our technique could be adopted for diagnosing various types of cancer at early stages.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID28846115
PMCPMC5736524
OpenAlexW2749817636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.