Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28846068›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2017

Pericyte-targeting prodrug overcomes tumor resistance to vascular disrupting agents.

Minfeng Chen, Xueping Lei, Changzheng Shi, Maohua Huang, Xiaobo Li, Baojian Wu, Zhengqiu Li, Weili Han, Bin Du, Jianyang Hu and 15 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting FAPActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vascular Disruption Therapy as a New Strategy for Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Pericytes in the optic nerve head.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Targeting FAPActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Minfeng ChenCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Xueping LeiCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Changzheng ShiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Maohua HuangCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Xiaobo LiCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Baojian WuCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Zhengqiu LiCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Weili HanSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin DuThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianyang HuCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Qiulin NieCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Weiqian MaiCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Nan MaCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Nanhui XuCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Xinyi ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Chunlin FanCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Aihua HongAnalytical and Testing Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Minghan XiaThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Liangping LuoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Ande MaSchool of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongsheng LiCancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiang YuDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Heru ChenCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Dongmei ZhangCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Wencai YeCollege of Pharmacy, and.
Jinan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNChina Guangzhou Analysis and Testing Center · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood vessels in the tumor periphery have high pericyte coverage and are resistant to vascular disrupting agents (VDAs). VDA treatment resistance leads to a viable peripheral tumor rim that contributes to treatment failure and disease recurrence. Here, we provide evidence to support a hypothesis that shifting the target of VDAs from tumor vessel endothelial cells to pericytes disrupts tumor peripheral vessels and the viable rim, circumventing VDA treatment resistance. Through chemical engineering, we developed Z-GP-DAVLBH (from the tubulin-binding VDA desacetylvinblastine monohydrazide [DAVLBH]) as a prodrug that can be selectively activated by fibroblast activation protein α (FAPα) in tumor pericytes. Z-GP-DAVLBH selectively destroys the cytoskeleton of FAPα-expressing tumor pericytes, disrupting blood vessels both within the core and around the periphery of tumors. As a result, Z-GP-DAVLBH treatment eradicated the otherwise VDA-resistant tumor rim and led to complete regression of tumors in multiple lines of xenografts without producing the drug-related toxicity that is associated with similar doses of DAVLBH. This study demonstrates that targeting tumor pericytes with an FAPα-activated VDA prodrug represents a potential vascular disruption strategy in overcoming tumor resistance to VDA treatments.

Indexed as

VinblastineA549 CellsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAnimalsBALB 3T3 CellsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGelatinasesHeLa CellsHep G2 CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsMiceNeoplasmsNeovascularization, PathologicAngiogenesis InhibitorsEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGelatinasesMembrane ProteinsProdrugsSerine EndopeptidasesVinblastine

Identifiers

PMID28846068
PMCPMC5617663
OpenAlexW2745403998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.