Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28845900›Full record

Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2018

Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden.

Peter Cnudde, Szilard Nemes, Erik Bülow, John Timperley, Henrik Malchau, Johan Kärrholm, Göran Garellick, Ola Rolfson

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Registry stakeholders.EFORT open reviews · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter CnuddeSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4919-7409
Szilard NemesSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.
Erik BülowSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.
John TimperleyHip Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, United Kingdom.
Henrik MalchauSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.
Johan KärrholmSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.
Göran GarellickSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.
Ola RolfsonSwedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Centre of Registers Västra Götaland, Medicinargatan 18G, Gothenburg, SE 41345, Sweden.
Centre of Registers Vastra Gotaland · SEMassachusetts General Hospital · USPrince Philip Hospital · GBRoyal Devon and Exeter Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National Registers document changes in the circumstance, practice, and outcome of surgery with the passage of time. In the context of total hip replacement (THR), registers can help elucidate the relevant factors that affect the clinical outcome. We evaluated the evolution of factors related to patient, surgical procedure, socio-economy, and various outcome parameters after merging databases of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Statistics Sweden and the National Board of Health and Welfare. Data on 193,253 THRs (164,113 patients) operated between 1999 and 2012 were merged. We studied the evolution of surgical volume, patient demographics, socio-economic factors, surgical factors, length-of-stay, mortality rate, adverse events, re-operation and revision rates, and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Throughout this time period the majority of patients were operated on with a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis. Comorbidity indices increased each year observed. The share of all-cemented implants has dropped from 92% to 68%. More than 88% of the bearings were metal-on-polyethylene. Length-of-stay decreased by 50%. There was a reduction in 30- and 90-day mortality. Re-operation and revision rates at 2 years are decreasing. The post-operative PROMs improved despite the observation of worse pre-operative pain scores getting over time. The demographics of patients receiving a THR, their comorbidities, and their primary diagnosis are changing. Notwithstanding these changes, outcomes like mortality, re-operations, revisions, and PROMs have improved. The practice of hip arthroplasty has evolved, even in a country such as Sweden that is considered to be conservative with regard taking on new surgical practices. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 36:432-442, 2018.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRegistriesReoperationSwedenTime FactorsWeight-Bearingregistertotal hip replacementtrends

Identifiers

PMID28845900
PMCPMC5873269
OpenAlexW2747482913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.