Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2018
Trends in hip replacements between 1999 and 2012 in Sweden.
Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Effect of Aspirin vs Enoxaparin on 90-Day Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis of the CRISTAL Cluster Randomized Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Higher revision rates in primary total hip arthroplasty among patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Early revision in total joint arthroplasty surgery - a narrative review.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
- The utility of cemented femoral stems in modern THA: a 10-year comparative analysis of the Charnley and Exeter stems.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- The True Dislocation Incidence following Elective Total Hip Replacement in Sweden: How Does It Relate to the Revision Rate?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip replacement: a narrative literature review.Annals of joint · 2024Review
- The impact of femoral bone quality on cementless total hip pre-operative templating.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Failure analysis of articulating polymethyl methacrylate spacers in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty.Bone & joint open · 2022Article
- Extended trochanteric osteotomy: improving the access and reducing the risk in revision THA.EFORT open reviews · 2020Review
- ASA class is associated with early revision and reoperation after total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of the Geneva and Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registries.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Article
- Registry stakeholders.EFORT open reviews · 2019Review
- Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future.EFORT open reviews · 2019Review
- Association between patient survival following reoperation after total hip replacement and the reason for reoperation: an analysis of 9,926 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2019Article
- Risk of further surgery on the same or opposite side and mortality after primary total hip arthroplasty: A multi-state analysis of 133,654 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National Registers document changes in the circumstance, practice, and outcome of surgery with the passage of time. In the context of total hip replacement (THR), registers can help elucidate the relevant factors that affect the clinical outcome. We evaluated the evolution of factors related to patient, surgical procedure, socio-economy, and various outcome parameters after merging databases of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Statistics Sweden and the National Board of Health and Welfare. Data on 193,253 THRs (164,113 patients) operated between 1999 and 2012 were merged. We studied the evolution of surgical volume, patient demographics, socio-economic factors, surgical factors, length-of-stay, mortality rate, adverse events, re-operation and revision rates, and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Throughout this time period the majority of patients were operated on with a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis. Comorbidity indices increased each year observed. The share of all-cemented implants has dropped from 92% to 68%. More than 88% of the bearings were metal-on-polyethylene. Length-of-stay decreased by 50%. There was a reduction in 30- and 90-day mortality. Re-operation and revision rates at 2 years are decreasing. The post-operative PROMs improved despite the observation of worse pre-operative pain scores getting over time. The demographics of patients receiving a THR, their comorbidities, and their primary diagnosis are changing. Notwithstanding these changes, outcomes like mortality, re-operations, revisions, and PROMs have improved. The practice of hip arthroplasty has evolved, even in a country such as Sweden that is considered to be conservative with regard taking on new surgical practices. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 36:432-442, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.