Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28845434›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2017

Phytotherapy and Nutritional Supplements on Breast Cancer.

C M Lopes, A Dourado, R Oliveira

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Potential Anticancer Effect ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. In Vitro Evaluation of Olive Leaf (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Anticancer, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dual Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. HPLC Analysis and Molecular Docking Study ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. LC-PDA-MS and GC-MS Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Targeting Virulence Factors ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C M LopesFernando Pessoa Energy, Environment, and Health Research Unit/Biomedical Research Center (FP-ENAS/CEBIMED), Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-032X
A DouradoEMAC (School of Alternative and Complementary Medicines), Porto, Portugal.
R OliveiraFernando Pessoa Energy, Environment, and Health Research Unit/Biomedical Research Center (FP-ENAS/CEBIMED), Faculty of Health Sciences, Fernando Pessoa University, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0258-9472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most frequent type of nonskin malignancy among women worldwide. In general, conventional cancer treatment options (i.e., surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, biological therapy, and hormone therapy) are not completely effective. Recurrence and other pathologic situations are still an issue in breast cancer patients due to side effects, toxicity of drugs in normal cells, and aggressive behaviour of the tumours. From this point of view, breast cancer therapy and adjuvant methods represent a promising and challenging field for researchers. In the last few years, the use of some types of complementary medicines by women with a history of breast cancer has significantly increased such as phytotherapeutic products and nutritional supplements. Despite this, the use of such approaches in oncologic processes may be problematic and patient's health risks can arise such as interference with the efficacy of standard cancer treatment. The present review gives an overview of the most usual phytotherapeutic products and nutritional supplements with application in breast cancer patients as adjuvant approach. Regardless of the contradictory results of scientific evidence, we demonstrated the need to perform additional investigation, mainly well-designed clinical trials in order to establish correlations and allow for further validated outcomes concerning the efficacy, safety, and clinical evidence-based recommendation of these products.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPhytotherapyBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCimicifugaFemaleHumansPanaxPlant ExtractsTeaVitaminsPlant ExtractsTeaVitamins

Identifiers

PMID28845434
PMCPMC5563402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.