Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28845391›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience and neuroeconomics2017

Neuroprotective effects of estrogen in CNS injuries: insights from animal models.

Narayan Raghava, Bhaskar C Das, Swapan K Ray

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience and neuroeconomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuroprotective role of Noggin in spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Narayan RaghavaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
Bhaskar C DasDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Swapan K RayDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
University of South Carolina · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

DIFFERENTIATION AND APOPTOSIS IN MALIGNANT NEUROBLASTOMAR01NS057811 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RAY, SWAPAN K. · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
PROTEOLYTIC CONTROL OF GLIOBLASTOMAR01CA091460 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RAY, SWAPAN K · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091460NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the estrogens that are biosynthesized in the human body, 17β-estradiol (estradiol or E2) is the most common and the best estrogen for neuroprotection in animal models of the central nervous system (CNS) injuries such as spinal cord injury (SCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), and ischemic brain injury (IBI). These CNS injuries are not only serious health problems, but also enormous economic burden on the patients, their families, and the society at large. Studies from animal models of these CNS injuries provide insights into the multiple neuroprotective mechanisms of E2 and also suggest the possibility of translating the therapeutic efficacy of E2 in the treatment SCI, TBI, and IBI in humans in the near future. The pathophysiology of these injuries includes loss of motor function in the limbs, arms and their extremities, cognitive deficit, and many other serious consequences including life-threatening paralysis, infection, and even death. The potential application of E2 therapy to treat the CNS injuries may become a trend as the results are showing significant therapeutic benefits of E2 for neuroprotection when administered into the animal models of SCI, TBI, and IBI. This article describes the plausible mechanisms how E2 works with or without the involvement of estrogen receptors and provides an overview of the known neuroprotective effects of E2 in these three CNS injuries in different animal models. Because activation of estrogen receptors has profound implications in maintaining and also affecting normal physiology, there are notable impediments in translating E2 therapy to the clinics for neuroprotection in CNS injuries in humans. While E2 may not yet be the sole molecule for the treatment of CNS injuries due to the controversies surrounding it, the neuroprotective effects of its metabolite and derivative or combination of E2 with another therapeutic agent are showing significant impacts in animal models that can potentially shape the new treatment strategies for these CNS injuries in humans.

Indexed as

estrogenischemic brain injuryneuroprotectionspinal cord injurytraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID28845391
PMCPMC5567743
OpenAlexW2727448372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.