ArticleAcademic forensic pathology2017
Medicolegal Death Scene Investigations After Natural Disaster- and Weather-Related Events: A Review of the Literature.
Article in Academic forensic pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Necessity of long-term support after disasters: lessons from disaster-related death criteria after the Fukushima nuclear disaster.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Extreme Weather Injuries and Fatalities, 2006 to 2021.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Mortality risks associated with floods in 761 communities worldwide: time series study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Assessing United States County-Level Exposure for Research on Tropical Cyclones and Human Health.Environmental health perspectives · 2020Article
- Community-wide Mortality Rates in Beijing, China, During the July 2012 Flood Compared with Unexposed Periods.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Oklahoma's Electronic Death Registration System and Event Fatality Markers for Disaster-Related Mortality Surveillance - Oklahoma USA, May 2013.Prehospital and disaster medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2017
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe number of disaster-related deaths recorded by vital statistics departments often differs from that reported by other agencies, including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Weather Service storm database and the American Red Cross. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has launched an effort to improve disaster-related death scene investigation reporting practices to make data more comparable across jurisdictions, improve accuracy of reporting disaster-related deaths, and enhance identification of risk and protective factors. We conducted a literature review to examine how death scene data are collected and how such data are used to determine disaster relatedness.
methodsTwo analysts conducted a parallel search using Google and Google Scholar. We reviewed published peer-reviewed articles and unpublished documents including relevant forms, protocols, and worksheets from coroners, medical examiners, and death scene investigators.
resultsWe identified 177 documents: 32 published peer-reviewed articles and 145 other documents (grey literature). Published articles suggested no consistent approach for attributing deaths to a disaster. Researchers generally depended on death certificates to identify disaster-related deaths; several studies also drew on supplemental sources, including medical examiner, coroner, and active surveillance reports.
conclusionsThese results highlight the critical importance of consistent, accurate data collection during a death investigation. Review of the grey literature found variation in use of death scene data collection tools, indicating the potential for widespread inconsistency in data captured for routine reporting and public health surveillance. Findings from this review will be used to develop guidelines and tools for capturing disaster-related death investigation data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28845205PMC5568778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.