Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28845114›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology2017

Outcome and evaluation of prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Johannes Byrling, Roland Andersson, Agata Sasor, Gert Lindell, Daniel Ansari, Johan Nilsson, Bodil Andersson

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Treatment approach for gall bladder and extrahepatic bile duct cancer].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes ByrlingDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital (Johannes Byrling, Roland Andersson, Gert Lindell, Daniel Ansari, Bodil Andersson), Sweden.
Roland AnderssonDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital (Johannes Byrling, Roland Andersson, Gert Lindell, Daniel Ansari, Bodil Andersson), Sweden.
Agata SasorDepartment of Pathology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skane University Hospital (Agata Sasor), Sweden.
Gert LindellDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital (Johannes Byrling, Roland Andersson, Gert Lindell, Daniel Ansari, Bodil Andersson), Sweden.
Daniel AnsariDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital (Johannes Byrling, Roland Andersson, Gert Lindell, Daniel Ansari, Bodil Andersson), Sweden.
Johan NilssonDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital (Johan Nilsson), Sweden.
Bodil AnderssonDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, and Skåne University Hospital (Johannes Byrling, Roland Andersson, Gert Lindell, Daniel Ansari, Bodil Andersson), Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to examine the outcomes and prognostic factors after surgery with curative intent for distal cholangiocarcinoma during a modern timespan, in a Swedish tertiary referral center.

methodsAll patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma between April 2008 and December 2015 were identified. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and histopathological data were evaluated for prognostic factors relating to mortality, using univariable and multivariable statistical analysis.

resultsFifty-four patients were included. The mean age was 68±8 years and 21 (39%) of the patients were female. Jaundice was present at diagnosis in 73% of the patients. There was no 90-day mortality. Complications graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥3 occurred in 10 (19%) of the patients. Twenty-eight (52%) received adjuvant therapy. Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 80%, 21%, and 9.2%, respectively. Median survival was 22.2 months. The presence of lymph node metastases was found to be the only independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.22-6.84; P=0.016). The total number of lymph node metastases, lymph node ratio or total number of resected nodes did not improve the prediction.

conclusionsWe found that the recurrence rate was higher and the survival poorer after surgery for distal cholangiocarcinoma than has previously been reported. Lymph node status at the time of resection was the most important prognostic factor for survival in the current material.

Indexed as

Keywords Distal cholangiocarcinomalymph node metastasisprognostic factorsurvival

Identifiers

PMID28845114
PMCPMC5566779
OpenAlexW2707062753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.