ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology2017
A decade of improved access to screening is associated with fewer colorectal cancer deaths in African Americans: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of access to colorectal cancer screening modalities in low-income populations after medicaid expansion.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Tailoring virtual human-delivered interventions: A digital intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening for Black women.Psycho-oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundControversy exists as to whether disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes in African Americans (AAs) are best resolved by screening at age 45 or by proper use of existing guidelines. In 2004, an aggressive colonoscopy-based CRC screening program was implemented throughout New York City. Our goal was to determine the effect of that program on CRC outcomes in our mostly AA population.
methodsCRC cases entered into Harlem Hospital's tumor registry from January 1992 to December 2011 were divided into two cohorts: 1992-2003, the pre-intensive screening era (PSE), and 2004-2011, the intensive screening era (ISE). Each cohort was reviewed for demographics, indication for colonoscopy, tumor location, tumor stage, and mortality. Multivariate analysis was applied to the pooled cohorts to determine factors associated with survival.
resultsInclusion criteria were met by 379 patients: 207 PSE and 172 ISE. Racial distribution, gender, age at presentation, and tumor location were not different during the two eras. Over 75% of patients were AA. During the ISE, 84% were insured compared to 34% in the PSE (P<0.0001). Fewer patients died during the ISE (21%) than during the PSE (67%) (P<0.0001). The ISE patients were diagnosed with earlier stages of CRC compared to the PSE. Increased survival was associated with being insured (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-2.81), distal tumors (HR 1.43, 95%CI 1.05-1.95), and being female (HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.01-1.850).
conclusionsA multifaceted program reduced CRC outcome disparities in a poor AA community. Aggressive implementation of current colonoscopy screening guidelines still has unrealized potential to reduce CRC mortality disparities in AAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.