Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28845052›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2017

Should Breast Cancer Surgery Be Done in an Outpatient Setting?: Health Economics From the Perspective of Service Providers.

Margaret Formago, Michael G Schrauder, Claudia Rauh, Carolin C Hack, Sebastian M Jud, Thomas Hildebrandt, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, S Frentz, S Graubert, Matthias W Beckmann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margaret FormagoFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael G SchrauderFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Claudia RauhFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Carolin C HackFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Sebastian M JudFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas HildebrandtFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Rüdiger Schulz-WendtlandFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Radiology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
S FrentzFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Commercial Directorate, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
S GraubertFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Commercial Directorate, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias W BeckmannFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.
Michael P LuxFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe care of patients with breast cancer is extremely complex and requires interdisciplinary care in certified facilities. These specialized facilities provide numerous services without being correspondingly remunerated. The question whether breast cancer surgery should be performed in an outpatient setting to reduce costs is increasingly being debated. This study compares inpatient surgical treatment with a model of the same surgery performed on an outpatient basis to examine the potential financial impact. MATERIAL AND

methodsA theoretical model was developed and the DRG fees for surgical interventions to treat primary breast cancer were calculated. A theoretical 1-day DRG was then calculated to permit comparisons with outpatient procedures. The costs of outpatient surgery were calculated based on the remuneration rates of the AOP (Outpatient Surgery) Contract and the EBM (Uniform Assessment Scale) and compared to the costs of the 1-day DRG.

resultsThe DRG fee for both breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy is higher than the fee paid in the context of the EBM system, although the same procedures were carried out in both systems. If a hospital were to carry out breast-conserving surgery as an outpatient procedure, the fee would be € 1313.81; depending on the type of surgery, the hospital would therefore only receive between 39.20% and 52.82% of the DRG fee. This was the case even for a 1-day treatment. Compared to the real DRG fees the difference would be even more striking.

conclusionCarrying out breast cancer surgery as an outpatient procedure would result in a significant shortfall of revenues. Additional services from certified centers, such as the interdisciplinary planning of treatment, psycho-oncological and social-medical care with the involvement of relatives, detailed documentation, etc., which are currently provided without surcharge or adequate remuneration, could no longer be maintained. The quality of processes and excellent results which have been achieved and ultimately the care given by certified facilities would be significantly at risk.

Indexed as

breast cancerDRG (Diagnosis Related Groups)EBM (Uniform Assessment Scale)outpatient settingsurgery

Identifiers

PMID28845052
PMCPMC5570589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.