ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2017
Evaluation of mouse red blood cell and platelet counting with an automated hematology analyzer.
Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematologic and biochemical changes associated with age and strain in aged B6 mice breeding in the national center of geriatrics and gerontology.Experimental animals · 2026Article
- Modulation of S100β and Inflammatory Signalling by Isorhamnetin Enhances Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Use of H1N1 strain A/PR/8/34 influenza to build a mouse model of viral respiratory sepsis.Laboratory animal research · 2025Article
- Efficient quality control of platelet-rich plasma preparation using computer vision and deep learning.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Clearance of erythrocytes from the subarachnoid space through cribriform plate lymphatics in female mice.EBioMedicine · 2024Article
- Deep learning-enabled detection of rare circulating tumor cell clusters in whole blood using label-free, flow cytometry.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- Time-Lagged Functional Ultrasound for Multi-Parametric Cerebral Hemodynamic Imaging.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Piezo1 Regulation Involves Lipid Domains and the Cytoskeleton and Is Favored by the Stomatocyte-Discocyte-Echinocyte Transformation.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Dasatinib Ointment Promotes Healing of Murine Excisional Skin Wound.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023Article
- Endothelial structure contributes to heterogeneity in brain capillary diameter.Vascular biology (Bristol, England) · 2023Article
- Improving the Quality of EDTA-treated Blood Specimens from Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2022Article
- Platelet Detection Based on Improved YOLO_v3.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Reticulated Platelets-Which Functions Have Been Established by In Vivo and In Vitro Data?Cells · 2021Review
- Article
- Physicochemical Properties and Hematocompatibility of Layered Double Hydroxide-Based Anticancer Drug Methotrexate Delivery System.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Dominant negative Gfi1b mutations cause moderate thrombocytopenia and an impaired stress thrombopoiesis associated with mild erythropoietic abnormalities in mice.Haematologica · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An evaluation of mouse red blood cell (RBC) and platelet (PLT) counting with an automated hematology analyzer was performed with three strains of mice, C57BL/6 (B6), BALB/c (BALB) and DBA/2 (D2). There were no significant differences in RBC and PLT counts between manual and automated optical methods in any of the samples, except for D2 mice. For D2, RBC counts obtained using the manual method were significantly lower than those obtained using the automated optical method (P<0.05), and PLT counts obtained using the manual method were higher than those obtained using the automated optical method (P<0.05). An automated hematology analyzer can be used for RBC and PLT counting; however, an appropriate method should be selected when D2 mice samples are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.